General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What message would we send if we quickly rejected Bernie and crowned HRC? [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)I simply said I didn't know why some people made the choices they made. The poster who was pressing me about that was trying to get me to say that the interests of those groups could be fairly represented by the less-progressive candidate, when we both know it never is.
I don't regard anyone as inferior to me. I simply rejected the idea that the less-progressive candidate was ever the best choice for their interests. I also think that the less-progressive candidate never represents the true interests of white working-class voters either.
Am I supposed to say that, if the majority of a certain group makes a certain choice, that choice can't ever be questioned?
My interests are not different than the interests of African-American, Latino, or LGBTQ voters. We all get screwed anytime the less-progressive candidate gets elected. That's all I'm saying.
seabeyond's whole argument with me is based on a myth...for some reason, she thinks that Bernie Sanders and Bernie's supporters don't care about racism, sexism, homophobia, trans phobia or any other form of group oppression. She has no reason to think that, since Bernie's record on all of those issues is better than HRC's or anyone else's in the race, and since Bernie's supporters, as the left of the party, are by definition going to be more committed to fighting oppression than centrists ever would be, and are better than Obama's own history in terms of actual voting record and principles. Obama has done some good things, but he puts the rich ahead of the people at least half the time...no one can seriously dispute that.
And I'm not even attacking Obama, nor is anybody else who backs Bernie, from what I can see.