Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
23. That's true as far as as LGBT rights go
Sat May 30, 2015, 05:07 PM
May 2015

I don't know if I agree about rights for people of color, over the past 20 years. I think things were better 20 years ago. Our school district here is completlely re-segregated, the prison system has a huge percentage of people of color in it, voting rights have been cut away at.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Glad you posted this. bravenak May 2015 #1
I'm trying to get a feel for where people are gollygee May 2015 #2
Refining what we're about and who is aligned with who orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #6
I keep seeing people arguing who want exactly the same thing. bravenak May 2015 #7
It does and your right . orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #11
One is hinged on the other . orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #3
I agree bravenak May 2015 #8
What he said ^^ Wounded Bear May 2015 #15
Right there with ya. PETRUS May 2015 #4
Yep bravenak May 2015 #9
i think the talking past is purposeful because of agenda. and privilege. and entitlement. seabeyond May 2015 #5
and i am not thrilled with the choices. that i can necessarily make a choice. the thing. we are seabeyond May 2015 #12
I don't know the difference between social vs. economic justice Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #10
they do overlap. this definition really helped me and i go back and check it out. seabeyond May 2015 #13
I'll try to give an example gollygee May 2015 #14
And if you are poor and a person of color odds cali May 2015 #18
yeah but there's social justice involved there too gollygee May 2015 #19
absolutely. they are deeply entwined. one is no more important cali May 2015 #21
That's true as far as as LGBT rights go gollygee May 2015 #23
Very true, but you can't look at somebody and necessarilly see if someone is gay, but you can't Exilednight May 2015 #28
Neither is functional without the other. Money doesn't solve everything but always beats having none TheKentuckian May 2015 #20
exactly cali May 2015 #24
You can't have one without the other which is why we haven't seen an economically liberal but TheKentuckian May 2015 #16
I know someone who calls himself that gollygee May 2015 #17
and he is lying even to himself unless he is using the global "liberal" which means lazzie fare TheKentuckian May 2015 #22
kick to see gollygee May 2015 #25
i wish there could be more of an understanding without the hostility and animosity. nt seabeyond May 2015 #26
I think most people here are saying the same thing gollygee May 2015 #27
i do not think i agree with you. but it does not mean that i need to have a problem with anyone seabeyond May 2015 #29
There might very well be some gollygee May 2015 #30
Kind of baffled why this is even an issue deutsey May 2015 #31
I am too gollygee May 2015 #32
Yeah, I know deutsey May 2015 #33
They don't though which is why the party has embraced "socially liberal but fiscally conservative" TheKentuckian May 2015 #36
Now you're making assumptions gollygee May 2015 #37
Here is not the party at large and where do you get off implying I don't argue for social justice? TheKentuckian May 2015 #38
I'm not trying to imply that gollygee May 2015 #39
Those that are Of Third Way persuasion believe that Bernie is Exilednight May 2015 #34
They are not different things Man from Pickens May 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll on economic justice ...»Reply #23