Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
3. Honored to be the rec that sends this to The Greatest Page.
Sun May 31, 2015, 08:31 AM
May 2015

This crap needs to stop. It's NOT OKAY to equate sexual identity and/or orientation with sick behavior... EVER.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have been wondering about this.... VanillaRhapsody May 2015 #1
As of now we don't know the age. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #4
I understand that....BUT a Republican like Hastert with that reputation of having a "clean" record VanillaRhapsody May 2015 #6
Maybe we need to look at this from a money angle... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #9
Oh I get that..... VanillaRhapsody May 2015 #11
Only capital crimes don't have statutes of limitations, I believe. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #12
Apparently it is on a state by state basis... VanillaRhapsody May 2015 #14
The old statute law had a fixed term AngryAmish May 2015 #41
Unless he wanted a child. MoonRiver May 2015 #16
That would be illegal... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #19
Of course. But he apparently didn't. MoonRiver May 2015 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #9
The issue regarding "gay sex" should not be on the kind of sex but that he was actively working jwirr May 2015 #44
Your mistake is letting right wing scumbags determine the grounds of debate Tom Ripley May 2015 #46
A minor technical point. Chan790 May 2015 #24
Learn something every day. Thank you. jwirr May 2015 #45
Age of consent in Illinois is 17, however people over 17 who are in authority over others can not Bluenorthwest May 2015 #59
that's been the focus here- that he abused those he was cali May 2015 #2
Honored to be the rec that sends this to The Greatest Page. cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #3
Can I still refer to him as a perv? tularetom May 2015 #5
Same here. MoonRiver May 2015 #17
I prefer sex predator or sexual predator as a label Bradical79 May 2015 #21
They are pedophiles, and laced throughout all of our institutions.... TheNutcracker May 2015 #7
I agree, it is one big exclusive club notadmblnd May 2015 #23
^^this mopinko May 2015 #25
exactly TheNutcracker May 2015 #27
I don't believe for a second that Snobblevitch May 2015 #60
That's quite cynical ---- but I think it has a bit of truth to it. erronis May 2015 #26
I know, it's why I said other politicians. notadmblnd May 2015 #36
that was the whole purpose of franklin cover up! google it. TheNutcracker May 2015 #28
YEs. Thank you. n/t catrose May 2015 #8
Just stop discussing Hastert, period Demeter May 2015 #13
It's a cudgel to use in our battle with the Republicants. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #18
He was a high school coach in a position of trust.. mountain grammy May 2015 #15
Many of us knew the same thing about Larry Craig for years before his airport bathroom brewens May 2015 #54
It's Relevant, Unfortunately jeremyfive May 2015 #22
I agree - why hide an aspect of his abusive behavior, especially since.... George II May 2015 #38
^^^THIS^^^ Tom Ripley May 2015 #47
I agree. If these "scandals" bring any good, it is that they shine a light on hypocrisy. Arugula Latte May 2015 #61
I agree but would add that I wish people would not use the word "diddle" DawgHouse May 2015 #29
all politicians so surprised yet ordinary citizens not at all. All pols are lying! TheNutcracker May 2015 #30
K&R! n/t RKP5637 May 2015 #31
Agreed. It's that he was molesting CHILDREN. It's not about sex. It's about perversion. OregonBlue May 2015 #32
Double agree - the perversion and the hypocrisy packman May 2015 #33
you said it beautifully gwheezie May 2015 #34
Hastert Thespian2 May 2015 #35
That is the answer I was wanting to give... erlewyne May 2015 #49
Thanks Thespian2 May 2015 #66
Maybe it matters HassleCat May 2015 #37
It should rightly be discussed in the context of homophobia MNBrewer May 2015 #39
What about the victim - does the fact he was molested erase the extortion? nt Laura PourMeADrink May 2015 #40
That's a good question DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #43
Hear, Hear. EEO May 2015 #42
I have to disagree with the OP Boomer May 2015 #48
THIS^^^^ LovingA2andMI May 2015 #53
+10 Joe the Revelator May 2015 #58
I crack up hearing about the freeway interchange.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #50
Gotta give the fella credit for planning ahead. He knew he would need hush money./NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #51
I've heard of such Duggary on his part years ago.. You'd think a guy like that brewens May 2015 #52
That's ludicrous. Boomer May 2015 #55
+1000 Tom Ripley May 2015 #62
I suspect the reason they bring up the gay nature of his assault is because Hastert is an extreme still_one May 2015 #56
Hastert's homosexuality was the focus of Barney Frank's comments this past week aint_no_life_nowhere May 2015 #57
He is a pedophile, not a homosexual. totodeinhere May 2015 #68
Please read your own definition! Boomer Jun 2015 #70
Best line on the thread.."Clinton is a choir boy"! She was over 18 and it was consensual, apparently libdem4life May 2015 #63
"Choir Boy" is not all that high a standard JustABozoOnThisBus May 2015 #64
.... Behind the Aegis May 2015 #65
Is anyone asking where the former teacher was able to amass a fortune? Kyblue1 May 2015 #67
Right you are, and thank you for stating it. nt SusanCalvin May 2015 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Please stop discussing De...»Reply #3