Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
10. Situation was difft back then.
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:35 PM
May 2015

Crime rate was higher. We'd just been going thru the crack epidemic.

Republicans were painting democrats as soft on crime, buzzwords about criminals "Getting off on a Technicality". Police with their "hands tied behind their back" "Liberal Judges" letting criminals off. Right before Clinton, Bush had kicked Dukakis ass using Willie Horton ads about a criminal set free to create crime again and highlighting Dukakis being a member of the ACLU which is code word for being soft on crime.

Dems responded by getting tougher on crime. We can argue the reasons but the crime rate has drastically fallen, but more police and stricter enforcement is at least part of it.

However just like the cutting of taxes and regulations, that helped with inflation and the economy, back then situations change. You just can't keep doing the same thing over and over when your problems are different and expect no negative results.

It's the republicans who are wedded to ideology and unable to be flexible in legislation when conditions require difft actions, not democrats.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kinf of nit-picky, given that you admit Clinton advocated for it, but ok. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #1
I'm leaning O'Malley Recursion May 2015 #2
My apologies. That makes more sense anyway. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #21
Recursion has been making this specious argument all day. Wilms May 2015 #11
Here's some more votes and stances he has taken on the issue of criminal justice, peecoolyour May 2015 #3
I like the full picture. nt LWolf May 2015 #4
pathetic. he voted for an assault weapons ban cali May 2015 #5
And Clinton advocated *for the same bill* and is being excoriated for it here Recursion May 2015 #6
Pathetic? LOL. Actually this OP is a response to the 70+ rec OP that is bashing Hillary for DanTex May 2015 #13
This is kind of funny OKNancy May 2015 #7
Isn't this your second post on the SAME subject matter this fine a.m. or does it just SEEM that way? AzDar May 2015 #8
The limit comes later in the primary season, judging by 2008 Recursion May 2015 #9
Situation was difft back then. hollowdweller May 2015 #10
So (D)s are now against banning assault weapons? Motown_Johnny May 2015 #12
Exactly, thank you Recursion May 2015 #14
Odd isn't it. ucrdem May 2015 #19
I'm unaware that anyone has criticized Hillary for her gun control policies. JDPriestly May 2015 #23
Yup. A tale of two DUs. DanTex May 2015 #15
Too bad...most of DU has blinders these days and can't admit joeybee12 May 2015 #16
Bernie also has not been a progression on gun manufacturer and control legislation... Sancho May 2015 #17
More popcorn nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #18
It banned assault weapons. Thank you for pointing out he is the only candidate to vote for that. HooptieWagon May 2015 #20
Desperate attempt to find something wrong with Bernie Sanders. JDPriestly May 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sanders, unlike anyone el...»Reply #10