Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
16. There has always been
Sun May 31, 2015, 01:34 PM
May 2015

a conflict here. From the beginning, when DU billed itself as a "left-wing" discussion group (which it no longer does,) the "left-wing" always took 2nd place to partisan concerns. Always.

DU has never acknowledged that "left-wing," or, now, "liberal," is not always a good fit with the Democratic Party.

Electing Democrats is ONE objective of DU; not the only objective. That's always been obvious.

It's also been obvious that many DUers are willing to use that single objective to demand loyalty oaths and to silence dissent.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Can you name one? trumad May 2015 #1
Lyndon Larouche Octafish May 2015 #11
Well, yes HassleCat May 2015 #2
i noticed the hypocrisy of that thread. the demand to allow on the one hand, and the demand to be seabeyond May 2015 #3
I think that perception is held by a huge majority here. kentuck May 2015 #6
you think majority is wanting a dem? at all cost? over losing a race to the repugs? i hope so. or seabeyond May 2015 #8
Like what? Adrahil May 2015 #25
I'm pretty sure that's the actual, stated objective. Recursion May 2015 #4
It is one of five stated goals. kentuck May 2015 #7
True. This site was a very early social network Recursion May 2015 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author kentuck May 2015 #10
As of now there are only two members of the Democratic party running... Peacetrain May 2015 #5
I guess it depends on how you read the TOS. The first 4 paragraphs: Cerridwen May 2015 #12
Thank you Cerridwen Hekate May 2015 #14
You're welcome. Seemed pretty straight-forward. Cerridwen May 2015 #18
Nobody is saying "don't vote for Democrats"... kentuck May 2015 #15
You posted in your OP: Cerridwen May 2015 #17
Sorry. kentuck May 2015 #19
No problem. How many browser tabs with DU do you have open Cerridwen May 2015 #20
Usually only one... kentuck May 2015 #21
Well...if that's the case we only need to check in and post in election years. canoeist52 May 2015 #13
There has always been LWolf May 2015 #16
You can vote for who you like. hrmjustin May 2015 #22
I think we are in agreement? kentuck May 2015 #23
If she were running as an independent against a Democrat? Adrahil May 2015 #26
No matter how sorry the Democrat might be? kentuck May 2015 #31
Well.... Adrahil May 2015 #34
Do you think Bernie Sanders is not an authentic Democrat? kentuck May 2015 #36
I assume you are asking if she ran as an independent after losing the nomination. hrmjustin May 2015 #30
Which is kinda like buying a car based only on the hood ornament. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #24
Your Senators are Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell and your complaint with others is that they Bluenorthwest May 2015 #27
The TOS is pretty explicit on this. MADem May 2015 #28
I disagree olddots May 2015 #29
Well, you may be right about that? kentuck May 2015 #32
I agree. DU should support Democrats, not Republican Lites. Nt HooptieWagon May 2015 #33
"electing Democrats is the objective of DU..." k. so lets get to work. i am having a blast seabeyond May 2015 #35
The Democratic Party is stronger when we listen to the people... kentuck May 2015 #37
i think three such different styles, what they bring to the table, smart and competent, confident. seabeyond May 2015 #38
Depends who you ask. H2O Man May 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"electing Democrats ...»Reply #16