Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

arcane1

(38,613 posts)

1. Indeed, IVF required destroyed eggs

Reply to cali (Original post)

Fri May 11, 2012, 04:06 PM

May 2012

You get an "Octomom" situation when the process goes wrong, and the extra eggs don't die.

At least, that's how I understand the process. I'm willing to be corrected if needed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Mitt's new twin grandchildren are a legitimate political issue [View all] cali May 2012 OP

Indeed, IVF required destroyed eggs arcane1 May 2012 #1

It's a legitimate line of inquiry gratuitous May 2012 #2

One more illustration of Mitt's hypocrisy and how cali May 2012 #3

how many were implanted greymattermom May 2012 #4

now you've done it SoCalDem May 2012 #5