Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

16. Exactly why this becomes relevent. We are not lily white.

Reply to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #7)

Mon Jun 1, 2015, 10:58 PM

Jun 2015

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] KMOD Jun 2015 OP

Source link please. Segami Jun 2015 #1

. Agschmid Jun 2015 #2

Thanks, I forgot to link it. KMOD Jun 2015 #4

I thought she retired in 2011. yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #27

I also was under that impression... Agschmid Jun 2015 #31

Maybe. I just wonder why it matters to us. yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #34

And this is relevant how? The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2015 #3

It's just as relevant as the Clinton speeches which seem to be brought up KMOD Jun 2015 #6

Well, the fact that Bernie's wife sucked as a college president The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2015 #7

No should it be anymore relevant than gossip crap made up to tie Clinton to KMOD Jun 2015 #14

So you are saying your op is flamebait? AgingAmerican Jun 2015 #35

Nope. KMOD Jun 2015 #37

You admit it's flame bait, then deny it? AgingAmerican Jun 2015 #38

Exactly why this becomes relevent. We are not lily white. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #16

I see a double standard here... Segami Jun 2015 #13

Bill Clinton is not off limits. KMOD Jun 2015 #21

Bill Clinton was president of the United States AgingAmerican Jun 2015 #36

I believe this is worthy of discussion. KMOD Jun 2015 #39

So because you don't like it when others do it you're doing the same thing? beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #20

I've been polite. KMOD Jun 2015 #22

If you're tired of those tactics don't use them. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #25

What about going after made up conspiracy theories against one of our candidates? KMOD Jun 2015 #28

Did I do that? beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #32

just as relevant as blaming hillary for what bill did. drray23 Jun 2015 #9

In other words, not relevant at all. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2015 #10

I suppose that one's spouse reflects one's values...here's more on the story... Sancho Jun 2015 #5

This appears to be an article from 2011. DURHAM D Jun 2015 #8

Get the posting about Bill stopped, that happened on thr '90's Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #19

I would usually agree, except many here at posting KMOD Jun 2015 #30

... peecoolyour Jun 2015 #11

Candidate's spouses should be off limits. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #12

I disagree. delrem Jun 2015 #17

Bill Clinton seems to be fair game. KMOD Jun 2015 #18

Her leadership was so awful that it earned her this: peecoolyour Jun 2015 #15

Interesting in what way? cyberswede Jun 2015 #23

KMOD thinks he's "getting revenge" for another thread Scootaloo Jun 2015 #33

She, not he. KMOD Jun 2015 #40

Okay. Not gonna vote for her. nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #24

There is not one time I've criticized the actions of a candidates spouse and the candidate Luminous Animal Jun 2015 #26

How did I miss this? MuseRider Jun 2015 #29