NYC_SKP has been banned

[BainsBane]

971. EarlG is the one who translated it

Last edited Fri Jun 5, 2015, 02:12 AM - Edit history (1)

You are the one who refuses to see it. The "goal," as you call it, was to make a vulgar, misogynistic comment about Clinton. You take the beginning of the first word and combine it with the last of the second word. It's not terribly complicated, and it has no meaning other than to insult her. The problem is that people around here think name calling amounts to calling out a politician. It does not. It simply reveals who they are and that they have nothing of substance to say.

The reality is Clinton has a good chance of getting the Democratic nomination, whether you like it or not. I wouldn't discuss any Democrat in the way people do regularly about Clinton. I probably wouldn't discuss any human being with the frequency and level of vitriol directed against Clinton. So what happens if she wins the primary? Are you all going to pretend you didn't call her every name in the book, present her as vile, use every piece of nonsense put out by the right-wing media? Or will people refuse to vote for a Democrat and turn the presidency over to Scott Walker, or some similar Republican. The effect of all of this is to suppress the Democratic vote. The GOP knows that very well, and they know they can take advantage of the widespread acceptance of misogyny in American culture to win the White House.

People do not turn to misogyny to attack a politician, whether Democrat or Republican, unless that contempt for women is inside them. I think it unfortunate, particularly since I liked NYCSkp and would have never thought him capable of such a thing.

Spare me your little victim pretense. The meaning is clear. I did not ban Skp, and I twisted nothing. You choose not to see it, and then go on to say it is for "a goal.' as though any name-calling, misogynistic or not, constitutes a goal.