Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
2. My daughter and her husband were married in the 1980s
Sat May 12, 2012, 12:51 PM
May 2012

by a justice of the peace. They had a grand wedding, but it was not in a church. They were married outside a country club and the reception was inside. But in the '90s, her husband joined the Catholic church. She is an atheist, as I am, but they had to remarry in the Catholic church for their marriage to be recognized by the church. She also had to attend pre-martial classes. Can you imagine an atheist attending pre-martial classes in a Catholic church and then having to be married again in the church. But she bravely went through it. They have since split up and are in the midst of a divorce.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Did you have to pay for those classes? MADem May 2012 #1
Hmmm.....I don't think so. K8-EEE May 2012 #4
That sounds like an excellent class - too many dioceses hedgehog May 2012 #7
My daughter and her husband were married in the 1980s RebelOne May 2012 #2
The irony is that the husband will now have to get an annullment hedgehog May 2012 #8
Personally, I would never have done the classes in the first place. alarimer May 2012 #22
The Reichwing religionists are vying for control of the theocracy they are creating state by state freshwest May 2012 #3
Those classes are called Pre Cana and I will tell you this much I went through them. southernyankeebelle May 2012 #5
You are onto something there tabbycat31 May 2012 #14
Yes that would be good. But I tell you the Pre Cana classes are really good and everyone should southernyankeebelle May 2012 #17
It's the one-size-fits-all approach I have a problem with Retrograde May 2012 #25
Chile and Italy also do this. Civil marriage is the legal one. Religious is the sacramental one. SharonAnn May 2012 #27
Precisely. rug May 2012 #6
I don't like having to defend the Catholic Church but your story shows they are being snagglepuss May 2012 #9
You mentioned it in your post Retrograde May 2012 #10
LOL. Since the government, and not the RCC hifiguy May 2012 #11
Why we need a complete separation of church state nadinbrzezinski May 2012 #12
I am for the separation of church and hate ashling May 2012 #20
the catholic church does not recognize my marriage; I do not recognize the catholic church rurallib May 2012 #13
"Return" as in rejoin? Ilsa May 2012 #18
yeah - rejoin rurallib May 2012 #21
I don't blame you for being pissed. Ilsa May 2012 #26
Well, my parents were both dead by the time I was 25 rurallib May 2012 #29
This is what's good about that whole separation of church and state stuff.... wandy May 2012 #15
Why did you not tell the RCC to attempt aerial fornication? PavePusher May 2012 #16
Melodie and I were married ashling May 2012 #19
Simply because they have you and me looking at this "christian man and woman thing" rustydog May 2012 #23
Marriage is a sacrament of the church RB TexLa May 2012 #24
My thought to that would be that if my marriage didn't count then their opinion jp11 May 2012 #28
I choose to worship Thor tabasco May 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My husband and I were mar...»Reply #2