Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
49. Too bad that's not my argument, Geek. But nice straw man
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 01:40 AM
Jun 2015

It needs to be elective, decided by the individual in question, just like any other body modification. It's an issue of consent.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jun 2015 OP
No one should be cut against his/her stated wishes SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #1
The background is a couple using their 4yo son as a political football during a messy divorce Recursion Jun 2015 #2
Well, SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #3
Circumcised men are not 'mutilated' nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #4
If you say so. SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #5
I do. nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #6
Just for the record, SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #7
Yes they are. The procedure results in irreparable damage Luminous Animal Jun 2015 #14
"Irreparable damage" geek tragedy Jun 2015 #16
Please tell me your procedure for bringing that foreskin back. Luminous Animal Jun 2015 #22
No damage. Had they removed my appendix I would feel the same way. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #28
Haha, laugh it up. F4lconF16 Jun 2015 #56
I'm not so much "anti-circumcision"... Scootaloo Jun 2015 #8
I have more sympathy to that view Recursion Jun 2015 #9
Link? (Not being snarky, seriously interested) nt SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #11
Here you go Recursion Jun 2015 #12
"high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence" joshcryer Jun 2015 #23
Yeah, the issue is the age not the merits of the procedure. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #34
Here's one Lancero Jun 2015 #13
I don't think that's a very valid argument Scootaloo Jun 2015 #15
Asdf geek tragedy Jun 2015 #18
And when performed on an adult, there is consent from the person receiving the procedure Scootaloo Jun 2015 #21
As is the case for all medical decisions regarding kids. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #25
Foreskins are not an airborne communicable disease with high infant mortality Scootaloo Jun 2015 #27
Parents make medical decisions for their kids. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #35
Rubella is a childhood disease, caught and transmitted by infant and toddlers Scootaloo Jun 2015 #40
Toddlers grow up to be adults with sex lives. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #41
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #44
I will go with what pediatricians recommend. nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #46
And I will go with what ethics demand Scootaloo Jun 2015 #51
Cervical cancer rates were known to be much lower among people with historically higher circumcision Hekate Jun 2015 #30
We are Catholic - both 840high Jun 2015 #54
Bingo. nt SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #10
The decision is pretty much made one way or the other by the parent. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #17
And the person with the foreskin can have it removed if he wants to Scootaloo Jun 2015 #19
It's a much more difficult, complicated, and painful procedure for an adult. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #20
And the adult will be weighing those benefits and risks and coming to his own decision Scootaloo Jun 2015 #24
Nice academic argument, but not one that has much meaning to geek tragedy Jun 2015 #26
If you want it done, you can have it done Scootaloo Jun 2015 #32
Again, illusory choice. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #33
All cosmetic surgery hurts and requires some psychological adaptation Scootaloo Jun 2015 #36
It's not cosmetic surgery. There are clear public health benefits geek tragedy Jun 2015 #37
It is cosmetic surgery, Geek Scootaloo Jun 2015 #42
And if they never had non-monogamous sex at all there would be zero STDs! geek tragedy Jun 2015 #45
Too bad that's not my argument, Geek. But nice straw man Scootaloo Jun 2015 #49
I've been told informed consent is an important part of medical ethics Dragonfli Jun 2015 #29
I don't know the details, but the fact that he is being used by two parents davidpdx Jun 2015 #47
You state that you are not sure of the accuracy of this info, but we should all contact the hospital Hekate Jun 2015 #31
Not sure DOXing is what DU wants to be known for. This should be deleted or hidden. nt Bonobo Jun 2015 #38
Not sure what DOXing is...? Hekate Jun 2015 #39
Here Bonobo Jun 2015 #43
Ah yes, Internet stalking is a well known technique among anti-choice terrorists. They like to... Hekate Jun 2015 #48
I did. Bonobo Jun 2015 #50
Good call Hekate Jun 2015 #52
I think the "circumcised men are mutilated" angle is particularly bad. Bonobo Jun 2015 #53
I can't understand the human obsession with altering and mutilating genitalia. underahedgerow Jun 2015 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #49