General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary - “the ones who gamed the system by buying politicians like her... [View all]Martin Eden
(15,636 posts)Unless you can find evidence the Sanders campaign instructed or paid Bill Moyers or DUers to point out HRC's deep connections to Wall Street, the link you posted is irrelevant.
But that's not what's important here, or why I think you're mistaken.
Vitally important is for the American people to be fully informed about the candidates for the most influential and powerful elected office in the world.
Why would you not want voters to be fully informed?
I would join you in criticizing negative attacks containing half-truths or outright lies, like smearing Obama as a non-citizen/muslim/marxist. But your posts in this thread do not dispute the facts and the point being made in the OP. Instead, you're criticizing the OP because you apparently think exposing the real live skeletons in Hillary's closet will somehow hurt Bernie more than Hillary.
I think you are terribly mistaken about that.
Most Democrats who vote for Hillary Clinton in the primary will do so believing that as president she will be a champion for the vast majority of people who are not rich and do not benefit from senseless wars in the Middle East. Many of them would be disabused of that notion if they were better informed about Hillary's actual record and cozy relationship with the titans of finance whose schemes crashed our economy.
A hawkish Wall Street Dem in the Oval Office will NOT be the champion for change that our country so desperately needs.
I think the vast majority of Democratic primary voters would agree with that statement, but they simply don't know it describes Hillary Clinton. It's vitally important they know it.