Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,970 posts)
36. I happen to think the two criticisms you raised are absolutely fair
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 12:41 PM
Jun 2015

...and applied to ALL of our candidates.

In the real world, people are looking to see if these candidates are emphasizing, prioritizing, or effectively representing many issues which directly concern them. Certainly issues and concerns related to race and gender are paramount to many Americans. I wouldn't presume at all to tell someone they shouldn't express criticism of these candidates if they feel they are falling short of that representation of their particular concerns. That's what campaigns are all about; convincing voters that these politicians are on our side. Reducing participation in a primary campaign discussion to 'electability' is a betrayal of those legitimate concerns.

Of course, name-calling is offensive and inflammatory. However, characterizing positions and views of these politicians is what we do in real life and should be respected as free expression. I don't think we should try and restrict that exercise of our opinion here of these political figures just to satisfy the sensibilities of Duers or shy way because someone thinks an adjective or two is going to throw the election.

I can just see the history books now...

Sen. So & So's political decline began the day DUer, bigtree, made an unflattering comment about a statement the senator made. Lol.

Thanks and I agree. At the end of the day, we'll have a nominee and we'll need to pull together. FSogol Jun 2015 #1
Amen to that. tosh Jun 2015 #2
K&R - Harshly negative posts about Democratic candidates are a big turn-off. MineralMan Jun 2015 #3
Bingo! RoccoR5955 Jun 2015 #4
Exposing Hillary's many misdeeds is not about Bernie Sanders. It's about avoiding another DINO. Scuba Jun 2015 #5
No offense, but "DINO" is the kind of bullshit... Adrahil Jun 2015 #7
Hey, if you think a pro-war, pro-Wall Street, pro-fracking, pro-TPP woman can be a Democrat ... Scuba Jun 2015 #13
No more and no less than simplistic bumper-stickers are yours... LanternWaste Jun 2015 #17
Of course.... Adrahil Jun 2015 #19
No offense, but we are a divided party. Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #35
Post of the thread! LiberalLovinLug Jun 2015 #64
Indeed rbnyc Jun 2015 #81
Democrats in Congress have 3 sub caucuses: Progressive, Blue Dog, and New Democrat. merrily Jun 2015 #101
We're not THAT divided.... Adrahil Jun 2015 #119
"DINO" is Ignorant bullshite.. "another dino".. is another ignorant cheap pot shot at President Cha Jun 2015 #112
The biggest bullshit anybody can post is calling Hillary Clinton a DINO. MohRokTah Jun 2015 #12
Meh. Scuba Jun 2015 #14
A DIDO (Democrat in Deed Only) is worth a thousand riding the brand. TheKentuckian Jun 2015 #50
Bernie Sanders is no Democrat. eom MohRokTah Jun 2015 #79
Then being one isn't worth the ink I used to fill out my registration. TheKentuckian Jun 2015 #109
If he doesn't stand for democratic principles passiveporcupine Jun 2015 #110
Thanks for providing an example of the problem Politicub Jun 2015 #43
I agree with you .. the problem is yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #6
Google the author? Adrahil Jun 2015 #9
All of this stuff takes TIME...and Time means someone else will post it first. yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #15
Why is important that you post it first? Adrahil Jun 2015 #18
If I don't post first someone else yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #30
Just make sure said kitty photos haven't been posted before. Beartracks Jun 2015 #59
Heh...you made me smile!! stop that! yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #63
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #29
Yeah fuck yeah yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #31
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #38
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #42
And we could do with less of your posts around here. I think that'll happen soon enough. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #44
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #45
and your response seems to exemplify the OP's point. Dyedinthewoolliberal Jun 2015 #53
I hope they get rid of you. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #55
Gone LiberalLovinLug Jun 2015 #58
Thank you. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #62
Enjoy your stay! BeanMusical Jun 2015 #49
Wow. It's like the House Un-American Activities Committee has been reborn. jtuck004 Jun 2015 #51
There is no need to google an author. That's just lazy, echo chamber thinking-- Marr Jun 2015 #40
I wouldn't worry about that so much. Raine1967 Jun 2015 #65
No I am done... yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #66
I understand the frustration. Raine1967 Jun 2015 #68
I have access to many Asian news websites... yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #69
Don't let the trolls and disruptors get you down here Rhiannon12866 Jun 2015 #85
This person is no troll... yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #87
I take your point Rhiannon12866 Jun 2015 #90
Sorry Rhiannon I am done... yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #92
I know I'm not going to change your mind Rhiannon12866 Jun 2015 #93
I am sad about that. Admiral Loinpresser Jun 2015 #94
I will post in GD...and yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #96
If it's any consolation, Admiral Loinpresser Jun 2015 #98
You shouldn't let it bother you when someone questions your source. Most of the time I don't know A Simple Game Jun 2015 #78
I'll say this bigtree Jun 2015 #8
but ultimately, this board is about advancing Democrats and defeating Republicans. Adrahil Jun 2015 #10
it doesn't remove your bias to claim that you're for 'advancing Democrats' bigtree Jun 2015 #20
Of course, it is all subjective..... Adrahil Jun 2015 #24
I happen to think the two criticisms you raised are absolutely fair bigtree Jun 2015 #36
Totally. I think we all need to remember it, regardless which Democrat we're supporting. calimary Jun 2015 #88
If you think it is a skewed cheap shot, then defend your candidate passiveporcupine Jun 2015 #114
That's not the point, though, is it? Adrahil Jun 2015 #118
What may be a perjorative reference to you, passiveporcupine Jun 2015 #120
You can ask for comity all you want...People come here to fight! DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #11
Gandhi said this about the 2016 primaries... LanternWaste Jun 2015 #16
Gandhi was so ahead of his time! LynneSin Jun 2015 #32
Well, it looks like at least one of the folks posting 6+ anti-Hillary hit OPs per day is on a stevenleser Jun 2015 #21
^^^^ THIS ^^^^ Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #70
DUers should be able to post the pros and the cons of our candidates. demmiblue Jun 2015 #22
Nothing wrong with negative when it is based on facts and not innuendos LynneSin Jun 2015 #37
Also, starting a meta thread in GD is just asking for trouble. n/t demmiblue Jun 2015 #23
We are fortunate to have some great candidates in this election. Laser102 Jun 2015 #25
Meta in GD but of course this will be allowed to stand! nt Logical Jun 2015 #26
+1 Of course it will. BeanMusical Jun 2015 #54
Agreed-a Sanders supporter evidently felt that calling me a bad father would win my support Gothmog Jun 2015 #27
I agree 100%. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2015 #28
We can all tell the difference between campaign "hit pieces" and information about a candidate leveymg Jun 2015 #33
K&R liberal N proud Jun 2015 #34
Agreed! Dem bashing helps the GOP lewebley3 Jun 2015 #39
Well said and very true! 40RatRod Jun 2015 #41
I don't think it is helpful to cover up the weaknesses of the candidates. JDPriestly Jun 2015 #46
K&R! stonecutter357 Jun 2015 #47
Looks like someone's getting nervous Fearless Jun 2015 #48
This can't be said enough. we can do it Jun 2015 #52
A kay and and arr !! SCantiGOP Jun 2015 #56
Mud slinging can be counter-productive - if Candidate A or candidate A's supporters are spreading hedgehog Jun 2015 #57
K&R mate. Main matter is that whomever wins primary for us wins the General. Amimnoch Jun 2015 #60
It really doesn't count for much what takes place on an online forum tularetom Jun 2015 #61
Amen Cryptoad Jun 2015 #67
You mean like passing the TPP? truebrit71 Jun 2015 #71
K & R SunSeeker Jun 2015 #72
LynneSin, you are about as wrong as you can be. Martin Eden Jun 2015 #73
+1 AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #91
My head and heart totally agree, SleeplessinSoCal Jun 2015 #74
agreed! we'll talk only about past proposals and policies, their role in the party structure, MisterP Jun 2015 #75
More cowbell! HassleCat Jun 2015 #76
"Underground"? jalan48 Jun 2015 #77
+1 rbnyc Jun 2015 #82
Me too. I don't think some of the folks on here really know what the term means. jalan48 Jun 2015 #83
Though I share your view of the word underground, dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #100
I think maybe a mission statement for this site would be appropriate. jalan48 Jun 2015 #102
Seeing David Allen as the DLC site designer didn't answer it for you? dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #103
See my sig line wyldwolf Jun 2015 #106
Thanks for the clarification. I guess the name David Allen didn't ring a bell. jalan48 Jun 2015 #107
No problem dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #113
Thanks for the info. jalan48 Jun 2015 #117
Very good point. kath Jun 2015 #84
I'll just go with the founder of this site's definition of Underground. wyldwolf Jun 2015 #105
You know I love you, but no. rbnyc Jun 2015 #80
DU has O'Malley and Chaffee supporters? progressoid Jun 2015 #86
Metric users for Chafee? LynneSin Jun 2015 #89
My first reaction was to agree. Admiral Loinpresser Jun 2015 #95
Very much agree LynneSin. lovemydog Jun 2015 #97
Amen. One of the worst offenders is on timeout. Kingofalldems Jun 2015 #99
Amen, sister Hekate Jun 2015 #104
No negative ads and comments Sean23 Jun 2015 #108
I'm confused...are you talking to Obama? ibegurpard Jun 2015 #111
Here was some dirty politics against Democrats. PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #115
It's nice of you to ask, Lynne.. but that's not going to happen. On the plus side.. it only says Cha Jun 2015 #116
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Stop with the damn dirty ...»Reply #36