Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
30. TPA isn't about trade, but providing mechanisms bypassing what should be the normal process...
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 01:51 AM
Jun 2015

... of instituting *trade* deals. And by bypassing what is supposed to be done for approving treaties and throwing in things like the ISDS court which has LITTLE to do with trade, and EVERYTHING to do with putting corporate power over our own government power, TPA was a bill that shouldn't have passed, whether you think that your state is dependent on good trade deals (which I question as well) or not. The problem is that passing TPA makes it that much harder to stop BAD trade deals like the TPP is (or it wouldn't be secret!) that SCREW Americans, no matter how much an area is dependent on foreign trade.

They say we in Portland and Oregon are dependent on that too, which is why Wyden and three of our four democrats supported it along with the one Republican congressman in our state. But there is a lot of resistance from many of us who see through this corporate propaganda from the likes of Nike. Similarly, the state saw through the press's propaganda (like the Oregonian) and Oregonians of all parties basically threw out the "top two primary" that was what corporate America, billionaires and their servants like the Oregonian wanted and endorsed. We need more grass roots from voters like what happened with that ballot measure for votes like this to tell our government NO, when they are being hoodwinked into screwing us again. I'm guessing that the same propaganda was being spewed by politicians, etc. up in the Northwest before we had the protests in Seattle before NAFTA too, where the protestors were RIGHT to do what they were doing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why would he run against something that most Democrats support? Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #1
You are confusing trade with what TPP and TPA are really! cascadiance Jun 2015 #2
Dennis? No, thanks. We Washingtonians don't need to be saved by any Ohioans. n/t pnwmom Jun 2015 #3
I though that he had some ties up there that had him wanting to move there earlier... cascadiance Jun 2015 #4
I've never heard of any. And the reason for the votes here is that pnwmom Jun 2015 #6
what kind of jobs were gained ? JI7 Jun 2015 #7
Boeing-related and tech jobs is what I understand. Some port connected jobs, too. pnwmom Jun 2015 #8
I wonder how many of those new local jobs are using H-1B Visas too... cascadiance Jun 2015 #13
Good question. There is a lot of pressure here for those Visas, but I don't know pnwmom Jun 2015 #15
why ? he would lose JI7 Jun 2015 #5
I was only offering someone that had once looked to move here... cascadiance Jun 2015 #10
I'd happily vote for him in my district. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #9
Move Dennis Move aspirant Jun 2015 #11
Yes, too bad he didn't move up there earlier... cascadiance Jun 2015 #12
This is really kind of condescending to the "locals." If we want to replace pnwmom Jun 2015 #16
Too bad they weren't there today to vote for the people's best interests. sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #20
Did you read the article? 40% of Washington state's economy depends on international trade. pnwmom Jun 2015 #21
Well, that is what we were told. That she would be able to win whereas we didn't really have sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #22
You should read the article. Our representatives have been getting plenty of feedback pnwmom Jun 2015 #24
So constituents KNOW what is in this secret deal? How could that be? And isn't the job of sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #25
You do realize that our representatives were barred by law from sharing specifics about pnwmom Jun 2015 #26
You just made my point, do you realize that? You stated that constituents were calling their Reps sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #28
Some of their constituents are Republicans, believe it or not.And some are Democrats or Independents pnwmom Jun 2015 #31
Really..... you'd vote for a Fox News guy? (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #14
One of the best Democrats we had, he stood up to the Bush regime and of course was hated by the far sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #19
Are there any HRC DU posters that are Fox News Guys aspirant Jun 2015 #32
I would be happy if he primaried some of our DINOs. n/t PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #17
Yes, that would be a great choice. Note how the Corps hated him, which makes him all the more sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #18
IMO aspirant Jun 2015 #33
Dennis Kucinich couldn't get nominated when his district became marginally less liberal... brooklynite Jun 2015 #23
I think you are confused. His district was merged with Marcy Kapturs, another liberal Democrat cascadiance Jun 2015 #29
One vote aspirant Jun 2015 #34
Washington's economy is now based KT2000 Jun 2015 #27
TPA isn't about trade, but providing mechanisms bypassing what should be the normal process... cascadiance Jun 2015 #30
I understand this is corporations KT2000 Jun 2015 #35
We'll take him in Oregon DiverDave Jun 2015 #36
He's a board member of his buddy Ron Paul's libraterian think tank. PeaceNikki Jun 2015 #37
Really? Sigh. That explains the appearnce on Infowars and the Faux gig. freshwest Jun 2015 #39
Not kidding. Not even a little. PeaceNikki Jun 2015 #40
OMFG... Thanks, PeaceNikki. n/t freshwest Jun 2015 #41
Wow ismnotwasm Jun 2015 #42
And leave his cushy job at FoxNews? Freddie Stubbs Jun 2015 #38
Why doesn't he just run for president? I hear the third time is the charm! tritsofme Jun 2015 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Suggestion, perhaps Denni...»Reply #30