General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)and I'll agree 100% but it seems to me the direction of the righteous anger is not at in all proportion to influence on building on and maintaining the problems among those there is any hope of influencing nor profile to really get front and center.
The situation is evolving but if the pressure versus pass orientation holds, I won't feel much represented or spoken for.
In fact, I will feel like I'm being used as a pawn in a dirty con game to protect the structural status quo decorated with a little fluff and flourish to keep the marks distracted regardless of the asserted to be and seemingly self evident actual intentions because that will be the fruit of it unless it works on the pass folks like shooting a board member to scare the CEO, which doesn't seem to work to much effect on believe in "where else are you going to go?" as a central organizing tenet (and a part of what I fear causes and will continue the hands off approach for certain inferred and always "good enough" plus allies the "we have to work with them" factor).
You simply aren't going to rapture out hundreds of years chattel status with various levels of animalizing that persist to this day out of the existing institutions, laws, and favored majority minds that act as a rudder for policy, control enforcement, motivate prosecutions and passes, and will be a heavy influence on the final check aka jurist.
Add in an adversarial, biased to the state, and money driven legal system pitted against those least likely to be resourced and you find yourself negotiating for rhetoric, window dressing, and in the end even more of the same driven by the same forces plundering off misery while tinkering around the most frayed ends to bring them in line with the tapestry of exploitation, abuse, and as always greed and dominion over others.