Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
38. If you think that's bad....
Sun Dec 25, 2011, 11:16 AM
Dec 2011

I recently gave up on an article I was going to write about the effects of Republican rule over the past decade. The statistics were unfortunately beyond my easy use or verification, but here's where I was going with it:

* While life expectancy on average has risen from 2000-2010, it has actually dropped steeply in Southern states, I think particularly in counties under strong Republican control. Poverty and race do not appear to be the reason; poor education, however, does appear to be related. In the meantime, extremely affluent people are living much longer, enough to skew the overall life expectancy, but representing an insignificant fraction of voters.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/06/15/national/main20071192.shtml

* The areas with the lowest life expectancies also appear to be the areas under the strongest Republican control. Smoking, obesity, low education, and high blood pressure appear in higher concentrations in those areas.

* The argument I was trying to make was that conservatism was the ultimate cause of increased death rates in those areas. Low education rates go hand in hand with poor health and political conservatism (you really do have to be stupid to be poor and Republican at the same time). Poor conservatives are also less likely to fully utilize the tattered remnants of our social safety net.

Now, I wished to argue, that combination is killing voters and damaging their health at an increased rate.

I was unable to come up with actual statistical estimates, but what I thought I could show was that the next election would be materially affected by the mass die-off of stupid conservatives, and that the die-off was directly related to Republican attempts to stymie health care reform, to keep the minimum wage low, to spike the economy while President Obama is in office, and to maintain tax breaks for the wealthy.

The result, I predict, is going to be several million fewer conservative voters nationwide in the 2012 election. Many of them will be dead as a result of the policies they enthusiastically endorsed; as many or more will be in a poor state of health come November and will be less likely to vote. Still more of them will be statistically indistinguishable from the voters that Republicans are intending to suppress, will also fall victim to Republican voter suppression efforts, and will be less capable of jumping through the administrative hoops that were set up to prevent their smarter neighbors from voting.

By backing a tiny, very wealthy sub-set of American voters, Republican policy has actually managed to kill off a significant chunk of their voting base. It amuses me to no end to think that America's conservatives, who have wasted so much time and effort fighting socialism and Darwinism, are about to screw themselves by killing off their voter base through the imperfect practice of social Darwinism.

Maybe I should shoot my thoughts over to Ruy Texiera and see if he can do anything with it. I'm probably totally full of crap, though, because I'm a terrible statistician.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks for the recs! MineralMan Dec 2011 #1
KnR 10...... :o) To win by scamming is NO CLASS...GOPers are cheaters and scammers...lying too opihimoimoi Dec 2011 #2
They don't give a shit about Newt anyway. LuvNewcastle Dec 2011 #3
Ah, but Newt cares about Newt. MineralMan Dec 2011 #4
If the Repugs were serious about fighting voter fraud ... zbdent Dec 2011 #5
Ann Who? MineralMan Dec 2011 #7
They don't have the foresight to see this stuff montanacowboy Dec 2011 #6
Exactly. That's why they fail. MineralMan Dec 2011 #8
They don't mind losing a FEW Republican votes in order to suppress tblue37 Dec 2011 #33
And all their ilk! Haha! freshwest Dec 2011 #35
This is ridiculous. Those laws were never meant to apply to Republicans. n/t Scuba Dec 2011 #9
Absolutely right. They were only suppose to bar Democrats MineralMan Dec 2011 #10
. PeaceNikki Dec 2011 #11
Most excellent toons... MineralMan Dec 2011 #16
I agree and they are now up on my FB page. nt stevenleser Dec 2011 #25
Karma liberal N proud Dec 2011 #12
Karma, indeed! MineralMan Dec 2011 #15
Instant Karma, in political time nt duhneece Dec 2011 #23
Priceless. nt bemildred Dec 2011 #13
Perhaps, but I hope it has cost them plenty MineralMan Dec 2011 #17
It appears to me that it already has. bemildred Dec 2011 #19
So it has...so it has... MineralMan Dec 2011 #20
Karma. Odin2005 Dec 2011 #14
Their dogma ate their karma, I think. MineralMan Dec 2011 #18
DUzy!!! Odin2005 Dec 2011 #22
Or, their karma ran over their dogma. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2011 #39
Beautiful! Gag on your own shit GOP. Blue Owl Dec 2011 #21
LOVE IT! elleng Dec 2011 #24
We can only hope! LongTomH Dec 2011 #26
True. Must be vigilant. 2012's not even here yet. I'm sure they've got other schemes. freshwest Dec 2011 #36
Cool but... progressoid Dec 2011 #27
Well, the GOP establishment wants Romney to win, so I'm sure they're not complaining n/t maximusveritas Dec 2011 #28
hee! Liberal_in_LA Dec 2011 #29
the GOP continues to bring the stupid.... blackspade Dec 2011 #30
just one thing: older voters tend to vote republicna on average is not true. Where did that sentence robinlynne Dec 2011 #31
The Republican Establishment does not want Gingrich (or Perry) as the nominee. They tblue37 Dec 2011 #32
Hohoho! Merry Christmas! Hoised on their own petard! freshwest Dec 2011 #34
republicans hate our democracy with a passion. mwb970 Dec 2011 #37
If you think that's bad.... sofa king Dec 2011 #38
With so many homes being forclosed EC Dec 2011 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP Attempts to Suppress ...»Reply #38