Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Goldman Sachs – Masters of the Eurozone [View all]
By Gaius Publius, a professional writer living on the West Coast of the United States and frequent contributor to DownWithTyranny, digby, Truthout, and Naked Capitalism. Follow him on Twitter @Gaius_Publius, Tumblr and Facebook. This piece first appeared at Down With Tyranny.

Interesting headline, yes? I have a two-point intro and then the piece.
First, when a private groups chief individuals flow back and forth constantly between government and that group, the group can be said to be part of government, or to have infiltrated government, or to have been folded into government. (Your phrasing will be determined by who you think is the instigator.)
For example, a network of private security consulting firms does standing business with the (Pentagons) NSA, and by some accounts performs 70% of their work. Are those firms part of the NSA or not? Most would say yes, to a great degree. Its certain that the NSA would collapse without them, and many of these firms would collapse without the NSA (though many have other ahem, international clients, which starts an entirely different discussion).
As another example, the role of mega-lobbying firms as a fourth branch of government was explored here. Same idea.
In the case of the security firms, one might say they have been folded into government. In the case of the lobbying firms, one might say they have infiltrated government. I hope you notice the difference; both modes of incorporation occur.
Second, consider how in general the world of money and the parallel world of friends of money its enablers, adjuncts, consiglieri and retainers flow in and out of the world of government, of NGOs, of corporate boards, of foundation boards, attends Davos and the modern Yalta (YES) conference, and so on. Now consider how someone like Hillary Clinton not money per se, though she has a chunk, but certainly a friend of money ticks off most of those boxes (foundation board, corporate board, government, Davos, Yalta, and so on). There are many people like Hillary Clinton; shes just very front-and-center at the moment.
.....(snip).....
Now the piece from The Independent (my emphasis). Note that it was written in 2011.
What price the new democracy? Goldman Sachs conquers Europe.........................(more)
The ascension of Mario Monti to the Italian prime ministership is remarkable for more reasons than it is possible to count. By replacing the scandal-surfing Silvio Berlusconi, Italy has dislodged the undislodgeable. By imposing rule by unelected technocrats, it has suspended the normal rules of democracy, and maybe democracy itself. And by putting a senior adviser at Goldman Sachs in charge of a Western nation, it has taken to new heights the political power of an investment bank that you might have thought was prohibitively politically toxic.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/07/gaius-publius-goldman-sachs-masters-of-the-eurozone.html
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So the Italian prime minister is a former senior adviser for Goldman Sachs and others hold high
think
Jul 2015
#1
Saying Sen. Levin doesn't understand financial machinations is very disingenuous.
think
Jul 2015
#33
Correct. Goldman is smaller than several other US banks including JPMorgan Chase
stevenleser
Jul 2015
#5
Silly article. There are 15 banks local to the Eurozone with more assets than GS that would laugh at
stevenleser
Jul 2015
#4
Right. Like saying 'this article has everything to do with the ECB' zip re Goldman?
Octafish
Jul 2015
#18
The main decision-maker for the bad decisions came out of Goldman Sachs to lead Greece is dumb.
Octafish
Jul 2015
#23
Do you think Vladimir Putin would make a better president of the US than Obama, Octafish?
NuclearDem
Jul 2015
#26
That was then. This is now, which is when you can't show where I called you an asshole, dude.
Octafish
Jul 2015
#38
Goldman Sachs was considered a case study in recklessness & greed for it's role in the 2008 meltdown
think
Jul 2015
#6