Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)1. Ok. Fine . I like Nader. But there can be no reasonable doubt that....
... given an honest count ( which of course was unavailable) that - in an election where there was a gap or fewer than a thousand votes between Bush and Gore - Gore would easily have taken the vast majority of the 90,000 plus Nader votes ( Yes I understand a portion of which would have not voted at all were Nader not on the ballot.) and thereby carried FLA by a relatively comfortable margin.
Again: Nader's an OK guy; but let's be honest before we start to pretend.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're promoting a perennial third party candidate and a third party itself at DU?
onehandle
Jul 2015
#4
Let's hear it for the Iraq War, Roberts & Alito, Scooter Libby, no WMD's, ignored PDB's
Renew Deal
Jul 2015
#13
Those who don't want third party spoilers should push more for instant runoff voting...
cascadiance
Jul 2015
#14
Lots of things contributed to Gore's "loss". I'm not cheering for any of them
Orangepeel
Jul 2015
#21
funny how they can blame Nader, yet ignore Gore's choice of Neocon Lieberman for VP
HFRN
Jul 2015
#26