Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Brother Buzz
(39,504 posts)11. Nader killed the Covair in the press, a car I liked
All the car magazines I read at the time thought Nader was wrong. Heck, even a 1972 safety commission report conducted by Texas A&M University came to that conclusion:
A 1972 safety commission report conducted by Texas A&M University concluded that the 19601963 Corvair possessed no greater potential for loss of control than its contemporary competitors in extreme situations.[23] The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) issued a press release in 1972 describing the findings of NHTSA testing from the previous year. NHTSA had conducted a series of comparative tests in 1971 studying the handling of the 1963 Corvair and four contemporary carsa Ford Falcon, Plymouth Valiant, Volkswagen Beetle, and Renault Dauphinealong with a second-generation Corvair (with its completely redesigned, independent rear suspension). The 143-page report reviewed NHTSA's extreme-condition handling tests, national crash-involvement data for the cars in the test as well as General Motors' internal documentation regarding the Corvair's handling.[1] NHTSA went on to contract an independent advisory panel of engineers to review the tests. This review panel concluded that "the 196063 Corvair compares favorably with contemporary vehicles used in the tests [...] the handling and stability performance of the 196063 Corvair does not result in an abnormal potential for loss of control or rollover, and it is at least as good as the performance of some contemporary vehicles both foreign and domestic."
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're promoting a perennial third party candidate and a third party itself at DU?
onehandle
Jul 2015
#4
Let's hear it for the Iraq War, Roberts & Alito, Scooter Libby, no WMD's, ignored PDB's
Renew Deal
Jul 2015
#13
Those who don't want third party spoilers should push more for instant runoff voting...
cascadiance
Jul 2015
#14
Lots of things contributed to Gore's "loss". I'm not cheering for any of them
Orangepeel
Jul 2015
#21
funny how they can blame Nader, yet ignore Gore's choice of Neocon Lieberman for VP
HFRN
Jul 2015
#26