Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)58. some people still cling to this fantasy
if nader had not legally participated in the democratic process, scotus would not have issued the partisan decision. bullshit. let's assume nader was not in the race, and a recount was still needed: who would to be to blame then?
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're promoting a perennial third party candidate and a third party itself at DU?
onehandle
Jul 2015
#4
Let's hear it for the Iraq War, Roberts & Alito, Scooter Libby, no WMD's, ignored PDB's
Renew Deal
Jul 2015
#13
Those who don't want third party spoilers should push more for instant runoff voting...
cascadiance
Jul 2015
#14
Lots of things contributed to Gore's "loss". I'm not cheering for any of them
Orangepeel
Jul 2015
#21
funny how they can blame Nader, yet ignore Gore's choice of Neocon Lieberman for VP
HFRN
Jul 2015
#26