General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: First they came for ConsortiumNews, and I did not speak out— [View all]dougolat
(716 posts)Last edited Sat Jul 25, 2015, 07:25 AM - Edit history (1)
...is used to defend the "respectable" sources,(the profiteer's teleprompter), and thus, the distortions, misinformation and outright lies (most often found to be so later, after the dust has settled and the deeds are done) and shun the voices who so often turn out to have been correct.
Case in point; the wall of noisy lies that led us into Iraq.
Does it take charges of "Putin-agent" to hide the shameful role of Nuland in Ukraine, or the dangerous, promise-breaking and outrageously aggressive behavior of NATO in the last two decades?
Does it take cries if "anti-semite" to obscure the awareness of the dual citizenship of so many of the pivotal neo-cons, or the shameful funding, arming, and defending the slaughter in Gaza?
Does it call for label of "conspiracy theorist/ wing-nut" to deflect criticism of the TPP and its siblings, or the power-plays of Monsanto, which are happening as we speak.
Or does it call for adult judgment and discernment?
Apparently there are many here who put their trust in the Official Bullhorn Feed.