General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: First they came for ConsortiumNews, and I did not speak out— [View all]reorg
(3,317 posts)For some posters here the difficulties seem to hard to overcome. But perhaps they just don't remember very well? Let me help you out a little:
The information in the article by Israel Shamir about the Assange accuser's connections to anti-Cuban circles was not bullshit, it was about facts and we talked about that right here on this forum even before Shamir published his article.
What was published at Counterpunch was nothing but a summary of what had been discussed the days before in Sweden. It was all online and ready for everyone to read if you would take the time and were able to decipher Swedish. Shamir happened to be there and apparently he is fluent in Swedish. So, thanks to him, even some of those Americans were kept up-to-date who would otherwise never have had access to this information.
That was the purpose of the article, that was the purpose of quoting it here, and that is what makes you angry, apparently.