Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Angry ex-wife puts hate for husband on display [View all]ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)116. Finding free, peer reviewed studies can be time consuming, but here is one...
http://illinois.edu/lb/files/2009/03/26/9293.pdf
Does distraction or rumination work better to diffuse anger?
Catharsis theory predicts that rumination works best, but empirical
evidence is lacking. In this study, angered participants hit a
punching bag and thought about the person who had angered
them (rumination group) or thought about becoming physically
fit (distraction group). After hitting the punching bag, they
reported how angry they felt. Next, they were given the chance to
administer loud blasts of noise to the person who had angered
them. There also was a no punching bag control group. People in
the rumination group felt angrier than did people in the distraction
or control groups. People in the rumination group were also
most aggressive, followed respectively by people in the distraction
and control groups. Rumination increased rather than
decreased anger and aggression. Doing nothing at all was more
effective than venting anger. These results directly contradict
catharsis theory.
Catharsis theory predicts that rumination works best, but empirical
evidence is lacking. In this study, angered participants hit a
punching bag and thought about the person who had angered
them (rumination group) or thought about becoming physically
fit (distraction group). After hitting the punching bag, they
reported how angry they felt. Next, they were given the chance to
administer loud blasts of noise to the person who had angered
them. There also was a no punching bag control group. People in
the rumination group felt angrier than did people in the distraction
or control groups. People in the rumination group were also
most aggressive, followed respectively by people in the distraction
and control groups. Rumination increased rather than
decreased anger and aggression. Doing nothing at all was more
effective than venting anger. These results directly contradict
catharsis theory.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OTOH, it appears she isn't suppressing anything and got it all out of her system n/t
Sheepshank
May 2012
#1
People who dwell on the negative and "vent" are more likely to become angrier in the future.
ZombieHorde
May 2012
#68
The therapist would be going against the common findings of scientific studies on the subject.
ZombieHorde
May 2012
#77
I'm no dr., but I disagree. It wasn't violence....it was getting rid of him, figuratively,
Honeycombe8
May 2012
#114
Not everyone finds peered reviewed studies to be very convincing, I guess. nt
ZombieHorde
May 2012
#115
Finding free, peer reviewed studies can be time consuming, but here is one...
ZombieHorde
May 2012
#116
From article: "Superior police decided to tow the GMC Yukon away" WTF? based on what law?
Liberal_in_LA
May 2012
#9
This might be therapy for the offended spouse, but will work against her in a court of law.
Ikonoklast
May 2012
#32
Was the ex-husband given the chance to remove the property from the premises?
Ikonoklast
May 2012
#37
Cheating on one's spouse doesn't come into play very much in divorce proceedings.
Ikonoklast
May 2012
#54
Supposedly men and women cheat in roughly the same amounts and yet you rarely
4th law of robotics
May 2012
#55
I'd be furious too. The cheater exposes his/her SO to incurable STDs, HIV etc
riderinthestorm
May 2012
#111