General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Cop Arrested After His Own Body Cam Refuted His Report, Shows Him Pummeling Teen [View all]
In his report, Fraser wrote that his victim, 19-year-old Michael Roquet struck me with his left elbow in my chest, and later he hit me again with his elbow
. so I struck him [with a baton] in the leg and upper body and then handcuffed him.
However, according to the body camera footage of the incident, it is clear that there is no violent struggle, and only a drunken college kid serving as an outlet for this cops rage. At no time in the report did Fraser mention that he struck Roquet in the head. Nor did Fraser mention that Roquet fell to the ground after the devastating blow and that he proceeded to pummel his inebriated victim as he curled up in the fetal position to protect himself.
He [Roquet] is not resisting at that point, he is on the ground, said Police Chief Scott Freeman as he watched the video of this beating.
Amazingly enough, when the department investigated themselves, they actually found wrongdoing. In the report investigators issued to Fraser after the incident they stated that You violated
policy
. You used hard control strikes from an impact weapon
on an individual who was actively resistant, but was not assaultive
. a strike to the head from a baton is considered use of deadly force
. You used more force than necessary.
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/cop-arrested-after-his-own-body-cam-refuted-his-report-shows-him-pummeling-teen