Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
47. You have judge each case on
Sun May 20, 2012, 08:26 AM
May 2012

Last edited Sun May 20, 2012, 09:11 AM - Edit history (3)

its merits. Someone's pain is usually another's over sensitivity. So the real question should be, does addressing some group's idea of pain, inflict pain on another group? If it doesn't put anybody else out in a significant way, one should consider adapting to a group's request for a change in behavior. For instance, people throw around the term "retard" often. But this is found offensive to many people with and who know people with different physiological cognitive abilities. It doesn't hurt me one bit from refraining from using that term and I'm happy to do it, even though I personally know no one facing cognitive ability challenges. Yet some people will belabor the point that it infringes on their free speech leaving the only option to continue to offend people.You don't have to know or feel why another group is offended by something. You just have to ask is it really that much of an inconvienance to me to give somebody a little slack and make their existence a little easier if all it is is changing a name on a team or redesigning a state flag?

In addition, political correctness doesn't mean you have to refrain from language around people of your inner circle who get the "joke" and know you're not really a hateful or mean person. Case in point are the many fans of South Park and Family Guy whose ethnic and physical differences have been targeted (myself included) yet still love those shows. It just means you are aware of the difference of when you are among the public at large and when you are among your inner circle of friends who will be more adept at knowing when you are serious and when you are joking.

It's all about being aware of different perspectives under different contextes, not about making everyone over-sensitive.

As much as an advocate for political correctness as I am, I have a lesbian cousin who throws out the term "fag" as a joke at family gatherings. Everyone knows it's a joke and I find it particularly hilarious. So the argument that advocating political correctness is just going to make everyone boring and stale and sensitive has no real merit for me. My life is no less colorful and fun than anyone else's, maybe more so because I can enjoy life's little forays into political in-correctness under the right context and without fearing who will be offended next.

But if your attitude is "I'm going to say what I want, wherever and under any context I want" and not worry about who is offended, to me, that's like shooting an arrow up in the air and not caring where it will land. You're just asking to be called out on it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good idea CJCRANE May 2012 #1
Nope. Nye Bevan May 2012 #2
Silly as your example is, it could marybourg May 2012 #6
Or it could just be plain stupid. Throd May 2012 #9
They are two separate things... Cave_Johnson May 2012 #15
I've never heard of a non-christian being disallowed pipoman May 2012 #44
Well i guess I meant "allow" in the marybourg May 2012 #52
Ishtar is the Babylonian Goddess of Fertility FarCenter May 2012 #53
That's geometrically incorrect. rug May 2012 #27
It's "ellipsoid" and you're in the wrong room. This is politically correct - "pedantic" is 2nd door. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #55
Oops. rug May 2012 #56
"this post is 'politcally correct'" vs "this post is 'respect' "? doesn't seem to make sense using msongs May 2012 #3
Think about it. Would you a call a black person a ____, or a hispanic person a ________, or a white CJCRANE May 2012 #5
So, if one is being "politically incorrect", one is being rude or disrespectful? MissMarple May 2012 #4
A PC term for "politically correct"? NoPasaran May 2012 #7
Well I considered it, and will continue to "politically correct". Throd May 2012 #8
I've been using the term for at least 40 years. hobbit709 May 2012 #10
I don't think so. oldhippie May 2012 #11
No. There's a reason PC sometimes has a negative connotation RZM May 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2012 #13
No, it was in the early 1970s. Jim Lane May 2012 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2012 #35
"politically correct" Shankapotomus May 2012 #14
Because it comes off as pretentious, for one. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #16
And neither will I understand Shankapotomus May 2012 #31
There are better and worse ways of framing things. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #32
so when tea baggers object to the term sharia or ramadan, you are going to back them up, arely staircase May 2012 #40
As outlined in my previous post, Shankapotomus May 2012 #41
point well taken and my example was poor, here is a real life one for yo arely staircase May 2012 #49
The name change would be Shankapotomus May 2012 #51
"pain"? Or simple over sensitivity? pipoman May 2012 #46
You have judge each case on Shankapotomus May 2012 #47
So you refer to Easter Eggs as "Spring Spheres"? Nye Bevan May 2012 #18
I had not heard of those Shankapotomus May 2012 #23
Well, that's why you need people like me on DU... derby378 May 2012 #26
Most of those 'politically correct' terms are RW nonsense CJCRANE May 2012 #28
But the difference between you Shankapotomus May 2012 #29
But I've never met a non-christian who objects to the term "Easter Eggs"*. CJCRANE May 2012 #30
It even sounds like something right wingers made up in order treestar May 2012 #43
Who actually comes up with these new terms? CJCRANE May 2012 #24
Very sensitive and caring souls pipoman May 2012 #48
It seems like the "Spring Spheres" story was a hoax... CJCRANE May 2012 #25
"spring spheres"might be more in line with the traditional meaning of easter Warren DeMontague May 2012 #33
I would never use a word commonly perceived as a racial slur hifiguy May 2012 #17
That would be too easy for those unclear on the concept. n/t EFerrari May 2012 #19
This is Help & Meta material. Quantess May 2012 #20
You’re orating equine excrement… TLM May 2012 #21
I dunno. It is indeed interesting to watch the progression in terms. trof May 2012 #22
so it isn't pollitically correct to say the words pollitically correct? arely staircase May 2012 #36
No, those words are very different quinnox May 2012 #37
i have never thought of political correctness as being exclusively owned by the left or right arely staircase May 2012 #38
But "politically correct" has a meaning that is distinct from respect. Marr May 2012 #39
THANKS! I've been yelling about this for years. Ship of Fools May 2012 #42
Sounds like a new politically correct request.. pipoman May 2012 #45
They don't mean the same thing lunatica May 2012 #50
When "respect" prevents discussion, it should be jettisoned. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you please consider...»Reply #47