Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bloomington-lib

(946 posts)
9. "private equity investment only has “a modest net impact on employment.”"
Sun May 20, 2012, 03:09 PM
May 2012

It's from the National Review but its the only thing I could find with a quick google search...apparently it's better for us not to know if they actually create jobs. I don't doubt that Bain can direct more money coming their way, but actual working jobs....

--------------------
A handful of academics – including Harvard’s Josh Lerner and the University of Chicago’s Steve Davis – last year published a working paper titled Private Equity and Employment. It basically defied conventional wisdom on both sides, arguing that private equity investment only has “a modest net impact on employment.”

To arrive at that conclusion, the researchers constructed a dataset that relied on U.S. Census Bureau’s Longitudinal Business Database (which is derived from IRS records). It then used Capital IQ and other financial sources to match up the LBD employment records with thousands of private equity transactions. In other words, while Bain Capital and other PE firms didn’t keep track of their portfolio payroll data, the government did. And some academics connected the dots.

Unfortunately, it seems that access to the LBD is highly conditional. Lerner and Davis were required to use the data only in the aggregate, promising not to report any identifying information about any specific organization – even if that organization was not specifically included in the LBD (i.e., financial sponsors). In fact, Census and the IRS screen all such working papers before they can be released, in order to make sure no identifying data is disclosed.
-----------------------

http://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/288051/how-many-jobs-did-bain-actually-create-greg-pollowitz

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

One time I don't agree with Cory marlakay May 2012 #1
Because they're making money off of the way the system is too? bloomington-lib May 2012 #2
Mayor Booker, why don't you join the fight! Democrats are submerged in lies from crunch60 May 2012 #3
So MTP went all the way down list to Newark's Mayor to find a Democrat willing to criticize the ad? Journeyman May 2012 #4
They were looking for a black Democrat to criticize Obama kenny blankenship May 2012 #7
DING DING DING DING! Amster Dan May 2012 #14
I think he inhaled Politicalboi May 2012 #5
We're too engaged and smart to 'shut up.' elleng May 2012 #6
The Attack on Bain Capital needs to be specific to the way the firm operated, not a broad attack on dkf May 2012 #8
"private equity investment only has “a modest net impact on employment.”" bloomington-lib May 2012 #9
Agree in part with Mayor Booker NeverEnuff May 2012 #10
I think he got too chummy with Gov. Christie while making that video DJ13 May 2012 #11
I'm uncomfortable with DINOS quinnox May 2012 #12
BINGO! We have another democrat angling to declare himself as the new DINO mazzarro May 2012 #17
Stupid, stupid, stupid BeyondGeography May 2012 #13
Booker is a tool. vanlassie May 2012 #15
I don't like Booker or Fenty.. butterfly77 May 2012 #16
Because Romney is running on Bain's wholesomeness and Bain has not been wholesome. The Wielding Truth May 2012 #18
Romney campaign on fire. Mayor Booker rushes in to save it. GreatCaesarsGhost May 2012 #19
Now there is a guy who should receive no funding or support from the DNC. JDPriestly May 2012 #20
Corey started out as a free-markets-fix-everything advocate. philly_bob May 2012 #21
Booker FOCKED OP! FarLeftFist May 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why can't dems just shut ...»Reply #9