General Discussion

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)

23. You are very wrong. Incredibly wrong.

Wed Aug 19, 2015, 12:50 PM

Aug 2015

http://www.people.com/article/jared-fogle-to-plead-guilty-child-porn-sex-1.4-milion-14-victims?xid=rss-topheadlines

According to the documents, Fogle got images of child porn of children as young as 6 years old from Taylor – Fogle knew some of the kids by name and had even met some during social events in Indiana – and had plenty of chances to prevent the abuse of other victims, documents state. If Fogle "had promptly reported what he knew of these activities, then the sexually explicit material involving later victims would not have been produced."

The next day, he sent her texts "offering to pay her a fee if she could find him an underage girl to engage in commercial sex acts with him," saying he would "accept a 16 year old," but, "the younger the girl, the better," the charges state.

This is really bad - Fogle was a close connection of the guy making the kiddie porn, and the Feds know that he knew.

Read the whole thing.

I cannot believe DU's blind eye on these matters. This are EXTREMELY serious charges.

These details are from court documents.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Subway's Jared Fogle is reportedly planning to plead guilty to child pornography charges [View all] Fearless Aug 2015 OP

Eeeeeew shenmue Aug 2015 #1

Wow. closeupready Aug 2015 #2

Give him life sub.theory Aug 2015 #3

Oh FFS it involves 16 year olds not children. CBGLuthier Aug 2015 #7

Oh FFS grown men having sex with 16 year olds is rape. prayin4rain Aug 2015 #9

rape? Nonsense. If a 17 year-old has sex with a 16 year-old is that rape? CBGLuthier Aug 2015 #10

No. Teenagers can have sex with other teenagers. prayin4rain Aug 2015 #11

No, I do not have serious serious issues thank you very much for the innuendo CBGLuthier Aug 2015 #12

38 years old is not adolescent sexuality. prayin4rain Aug 2015 #14

i agree with you about teen teen restorefreedom Aug 2015 #19

What is your range for middle age? mythology Aug 2015 #25

Slight correction: he's not middle aged, though he is far too old to be having sex with teenagers MillennialDem Aug 2015 #15

38 is middle aged to me. Maybe 40 to late fifties....but close enough. n/t prayin4rain Aug 2015 #17

Middle aged is usually 45-60 or 45-65. It's the "middle" of adulthood, not the middle of lifespan. MillennialDem Aug 2015 #18

He's a pedophile sub.theory Aug 2015 #20

You are very wrong. Incredibly wrong. Yo_Mama Aug 2015 #23

They're saying it involved 13 year olds on TV right now aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2015 #24

Or 14 or 15 year olds. Whatever age the escorts could find for him. Gormy Cuss Aug 2015 #29

he said he wanted them younger than that JI7 Aug 2015 #30

I'm not sure I will eat Subway ever again. ellisonz Aug 2015 #4

Subway fired him today. nt TeamPooka Aug 2015 #5

On second thoughts nope... ellisonz Aug 2015 #6

Do you still go to movie theaters? snooper2 Aug 2015 #13

That's not, really, fair to pee-wee. Warren DeMontague Aug 2015 #28

Subway cannot possibly know what their spokespeople do in their private lives ffs. cwydro Aug 2015 #8

Jared wasn't the one making your sammiches. Codeine Aug 2015 #16

I'll see you eat a footlong first! ellisonz Aug 2015 #21

Yeah, i'm not sure it is really the sandwich company's fault. Warren DeMontague Aug 2015 #27

Eat Fresh? aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2015 #22

It's far worse than that... lame54 Aug 2015 #26