Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TBF

(36,066 posts)
21. Why would it be someone in OWS doing something stupid?
Mon May 21, 2012, 10:03 AM
May 2012

It could just as easily be the police deciding to clamp down - they certainly bring enough personnel to do so.

Granted there are two sides to everything and agree that the report from the protestor about the anarchists is interesting.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Excellent post nobodyspecial May 2012 #1
That was an awesome story, and should've been Page 1 everywhere. Robb May 2012 #3
You won't get any complaints from me. Skidmore May 2012 #2
Those damned rock throwers TBF May 2012 #4
That's actually a great illustration of my point. Robb May 2012 #5
Ever been attacked by the police at a protest? Zorra May 2012 #7
Which protester in the UC Davis picture is out of control? Robb May 2012 #9
The PTB don't give a shit about protesters. randome May 2012 #11
TPTB don't have to quake in their boots because TBF May 2012 #20
Little sympathy for 84-year-old woman pepper sprayed at Occupy protest Zorra May 2012 #6
I doubt anyone at DU -maybe even CNN- takes delight in seeing an 84 year old woman pepper-sprayed. randome May 2012 #8
I believe that you misunderstood. I'm just not seeing sympathy for innocent Zorra May 2012 #63
Since OWS started, I have advocated more mass protests. randome May 2012 #68
Fair enough. Zorra May 2012 #74
. mopinko May 2012 #10
LOL. Why don't you give a rundown of the CNN coverage, Robb, EFerrari May 2012 #12
Oh, I didn't realize we were just protesting to the choir now. Robb May 2012 #19
Seriously, refusing to participate in propaganda is protesting to the choir? EFerrari May 2012 #27
So you oppose OWS. That's fine, you don't have to support it. sabrina 1 May 2012 #77
Bullshit pinboy3niner May 2012 #13
+1000 Cali_Democrat May 2012 #65
A typical rock thrower from yesterday's protests: coalition_unwilling May 2012 #14
Damn! How does he get those letters to stand up so well? randome May 2012 #16
Damn! How do you manage to keep posting your bullshit here? pinboy3niner May 2012 #23
Asking questions is 'bullshit', is it? randome May 2012 #28
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #32
A trouble maker can only make trouble if you fall for the schtick. If this poster rhett o rick May 2012 #37
I don't put anyone on Ignore pinboy3niner May 2012 #53
I also dont put people on ignore, unless I cant help myself but fall into their trap. rhett o rick May 2012 #59
My 'history' predates yours by several years. randome May 2012 #43
. patrice May 2012 #51
Yes, asking questions is a method of stirring up trouble. Instead of rhett o rick May 2012 #34
I believe I'm on cw's 'List' anyways, so he's probably not reading me. randome May 2012 #39
So when we judge a wife beater, we must consider all the nice things he has rhett o rick May 2012 #49
Eh. Using one person as an example is not the same as using an entire group. randome May 2012 #55
Did you say you were a police officer? UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #69
No, I'm not. Never been one. randome May 2012 #73
Why is it remarkable that more peaceful protesters were not injured? In a democracy sabrina 1 May 2012 #78
This crosses the line for me and DAMAGES a valid point in doing so. If you want to make patrice May 2012 #41
OK, how about this one: coalition_unwilling May 2012 #44
**I** like! that one, because it is more useful. **I:I**, as in I can see the possible validity of patrice May 2012 #48
I just heard snippets from the news about "generally peaceful" and "only a few arrests" -- gateley May 2012 #15
I am an occupy supporter and I agree with u 2pooped2pop May 2012 #17
Interesting perspective. Thank you. randome May 2012 #18
Why would it be someone in OWS doing something stupid? TBF May 2012 #21
Define 'in OWS'. Or, better yet, define 'not in OWS'. randome May 2012 #22
And my point is that it doesn't matter who it is. Robb May 2012 #24
We can't use that as an excuse to stop resisting. TBF May 2012 #30
Also by the logic of this post......... socialist_n_TN May 2012 #45
Then you misread. Robb May 2012 #54
Thankyou, once again, for your concern pinboy3niner May 2012 #26
Wither. randome May 2012 #33
Your time is coming, my friend pinboy3niner May 2012 #36
So it sounds like you want us to give up protesting because it may lead to rhett o rick May 2012 #42
"The corruption will not fix itself." Totally agree. randome May 2012 #47
It IS about income inequality......... socialist_n_TN May 2012 #52
Hell, yeah, we are throwing away cash faster than it can be printed! randome May 2012 #57
Well, riots broke out at Civil Rights marches, people died as a matter of fact. sabrina 1 May 2012 #79
Do you really believe that you can avoid being called an insurgent EFerrari May 2012 #31
I guess I mean 2pooped2pop May 2012 #62
That's a good point. Insurgencies can be peaceful and educative, too. n/t EFerrari May 2012 #64
By calling it "riot porn" you set up a self censoring......... socialist_n_TN May 2012 #25
Violence against police is a losing choice. Robb May 2012 #29
Riot porn that changed history: EFerrari May 2012 #35
Idiotic to call Kent State protesters violent. Robb May 2012 #50
Idiotic to call violence less pornographic because your side is "innocent". EFerrari May 2012 #72
I believe Martin Luther King threw a rock. UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #71
In any political uprising, especially a long term one.......... socialist_n_TN May 2012 #38
When OWS marched on Times Square it was boring UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #70
Calling it 'riot porn' allows it to be marginalized and seen coalition_unwilling May 2012 #40
Yes it does.......... socialist_n_TN May 2012 #46
Did anyone see Dan Rather on Maher over the weekend? There used to be 55 different news sources. jillan May 2012 #56
it never took a "handful of idiots" to provoke police violence against protesters G_j May 2012 #58
"although the truncheon can be used in lieu of conversation hfojvt May 2012 #60
"Look what you *made* me do!" - every abuser, ever. nt Romulox May 2012 #61
You make some good points, but police brutality is a very important issue to many people too. ZombieHorde May 2012 #66
I agree it's very, very important Robb May 2012 #75
All in one OP. Well played. Rex May 2012 #67
CNN never focuses on the "why", your point is illogical just1voice May 2012 #76
Yes, Robb is a dingbat. donheld May 2012 #80
I fully agree with your concern about a few violent types destroying the entire thing for everyone Fire Walk With Me May 2012 #81
I fully agree with your concern about a few violent types destroying the entire thing for everyone Fire Walk With Me May 2012 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Well done. CNN (and DU) g...»Reply #21