Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
8. it's not a police state unless you just insist on exercising your rights
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:19 PM
May 2012

Such a lot of complaint about nothing! Most people will never even see the inside of a police van or a detention center. As long as they keep going to work and shopping and keep their eyes front, looking down at where their feet are going, they may never notice anything amiss or police state-y or thuggish going on around them. Unless perhaps their name gets confused with the name of an evil-doer. Then, oh yeah, they're in for the surprise of their lives. But usually a mistake like that will get corrected before loss of life or limb occurs. And it's no harm done.

The Constitution may still say you have a right to free speech and to petition and to assemble and whatever, but it doesn't mean the authorities aren't allowed to make exercising those rights very costly to you and your family. Carrot or stick. Flat screen TVs or stress positions. Caviar or pepper spray. Your choice.

Life could be so pleasant if we'd all observe that one simple Golden Rule: Those who make trouble, or who fit the profile of someone who makes trouble, are going to be dealt with harshly. Those who don't incur the suspicion or wrath of the authorities shouldn't concern themselves with the fate of those who do, or try to "get involved".

Stick to exercising your right to accumulate material wealth without limits (or if you're unable to accumulate anything, just be a good loser about it) and you'll find it's the friendliest police state ever.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have not experienced a police state or fascism personally. randome May 2012 #1
I have seen police excesses, which are systemic enough that I'd use the term "police state". backscatter712 May 2012 #11
I have read three books about the Nazi occupation of France and one about how it all sabrina 1 May 2012 #15
It only took 2 years for Hitler to build his Nazi state. Major Hogwash May 2012 #20
I don't believe I said the US was a police state. sabrina 1 May 2012 #22
The road to fascism is taken in small steps. The last step is to feel the heavy heel of the Lint Head May 2012 #2
I agree it is overly hyperbolic and historically inaccurate SoutherDem May 2012 #3
Just because they don't let you know they're reading your email, doesn't mean you're not being leveymg May 2012 #5
It's not a Police State - it's a Polite State kenny blankenship May 2012 #10
"Friendly Fascism" - that's a great book by Bertham Gross from the Reagan era. Hit it spot-on. leveymg May 2012 #17
Case in point here IDemo May 2012 #6
+100 Thank you 99th_Monkey May 2012 #16
OK, just the facts then davekriss May 2012 #7
Loss of habeas corpus, the Executive branch claiming it has a right to assassinate..... DeSwiss May 2012 #14
this a 'uniquely american' form of police state. and it's got to do with more than KG May 2012 #4
it's not a police state unless you just insist on exercising your rights kenny blankenship May 2012 #8
This is a polite way to remind those who rather not have their weddings and such interrupted by those midnight May 2012 #9
K&R DeSwiss May 2012 #12
Why are you quoting a Commie coalition_unwilling May 2012 #18
That's my kinda Commie!!! DeSwiss May 2012 #23
Also "police states" look very different in their infancy, youth and mature forms. wickerwoman May 2012 #13
Emphatic K&R! A magisterial OP - n/t coalition_unwilling May 2012 #19
But trying to downplay reality is their only option. We've just fallen too far Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On "police state&quo...»Reply #8