General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Looking at the undisputed facts in the Zimmerman case and applying Zimmerman's original story [View all]Tommy_Carcetti
(44,493 posts)The purpose of my original post was to call into question the logic of Zimmerman's original story. That he was ambushed suddenly by Trayvon and almost immediately attacked with very little verbal run-up to the fight.
Perhaps Trayvon hid in the bushes. Perhaps he slowed down. Or, if Zimmerman's original story is to be believed, perhaps he used that time to plan out a spot where he would ambush Zimmerman and beat him down. BUT if the latter is to be believed, it does not change the original undisputed facts that Zimmerman chased Trayvon during a period where Trayvon had no guilty conscience, and in such situations human nature has flight taking precedence over fight when one is so close to safety.
I think you are overanalyzing not wanting to lead an attacker home. Houses have locks, phones in which to call the authorities, and let's not forget Trayvon was not living alone.