Looking at the undisputed facts in the Zimmerman case and applying Zimmerman's original story

[Spoonman]

101. I'm sticking with the facts

You're going beyond the undisputed facts and into areas of some dispute

Please explain what is "in dispute".

glaring deficiencies in Zimmerman's story based solely on undisputed facts

Your 6 "undisputed" facts are way too simplistic and narrow to formulate an accurate picture of what happened.

You left out the most important indisputable facts relevant to the case.

1. The eyewitness statement that Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman kicking his ass. (this is the only statement that has credibility, and has not wavered) and is supported by A, B, C and D below.
A. The physical injuries suffered by Zimmerman that are well documented by medical reports.
B. The physical evidence of grass staining on Zimmerman's clothing
C. Abrasions on Trayvon's hands
D. Forensic wound analysis of the gunshot wound

2. The recorded phone call with the non-emergency dispatcher where Zimmerman states "Oh crap, I don't want to give it all out. I don't know where this kid is". (He had lost sight of him)

3. Time log of ALL calls relevant to the situation including the call between Trayvon and his girl friend.

4. The ample time for Trayvon to get to his house to avoid this, but didn't.

Zimmerman's original story was that he was ambushed, out of the blue, by Trayvon.

I can't answer that question, and your assertion is somewhat embellished.

Zimmerman never claimed to have been ambushed "out of the blue", his statement to investigators was that he was returning to his vehicle, when Martin approached him from his left rear and confronted him.

His story has been slowly but surely corroborated by the physical evidence, and eye witness testimony.

Of course, as with everything else in this case, the embellished versions have become the "facts" for most.

Why would someone chose to hide out and ambush a potentially dangerous individual instead of logically seeking to seek safety?

Instead of trying to infer that it didn't happened that way simply because YOU don't find it to be a logical decision, realize he had more than enough time to get to his house as demonstrated by the time line of the phone records.

So why would Trayvon then turn the tables and immediately turn into the aggressor? It doesn't make any sense.

Testosterone?

Trayvon did not seek safety by going home, he did not continue to avoid Zimmerman by walking away from him.

Given ALL the facts at hand, it is apparent the Trayvon decided for whatever reason to confront Zimmerman and become the aggressor.

You and I have no clue why he did what he did. We can only look at the facts and accept them for what they are.