Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For people talking about having a 50 year old retirement age [View all]Dyedinthewoolliberal
(16,231 posts)20. Did you forget your sarcasm thingy?
_THERE IS PLENTY OF WEALTH to go around. But it is all being hogged by baby boomers in their late 50s and early 60s who are at the top of their careers, but who STILL INSIST on working 70 hour weeks to earn even more and accumulate even more. At the same time, these people complain about having to work too hard and not having enough time for family, vacation etc._
This is a rather outlandish generalization, don't you think? I'm in my early sixties and I have NO money (well, a little but not much) and I'd be glad to leave the rat race to the younger rats but I can't afford it...........
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Back when my husband retired, during the Clinton years, many of the retirees we met
Cleita
May 2012
#10
Please make a thread about this so I can rec it. It deserves to be discussed AT LENGTH.
Zalatix
May 2012
#33
I think what you said is probably the worst indictment of western civilization I've read here.
Selatius
May 2012
#68
The wealth isn't being hoarded by baby boomers, it's being hoarded by the Plutocracy.
Zalatix
May 2012
#34
i was with you until "it's all hogged by the baby boomers in their late 50s".
HiPointDem
May 2012
#71
I don't have a job to have self worth. I trade my labor to pay for things.
OmahaBlueDog
May 2012
#21
If it were distributed properly (to everyone according to need).........
socialist_n_TN
May 2012
#24
the entire concept of "self-worth" comes from without. it's a concept given to us by our society
HiPointDem
May 2012
#75
I retired at 62 and I am not bored. I don't know how I ever found the time to work.
doc03
May 2012
#23
When I used to see stories on the late news about little old ladies found dead in their
Booster
May 2012
#26
Yes. There is plenty of time between age 50 and dying amongst cat food cans
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#62
People don't need to feel like they have worth if they can have fun and sit on their asses.
dkf
May 2012
#27
yep. rich people don't have to worry about their self-worth. their money makes it irrelevant.
HiPointDem
May 2012
#76
A person's self-worth is not determined by how much money they make for the capitalists...
Comrade_McKenzie
May 2012
#30
Why would being retired make one feel worthless, unless their self worth was derived from work?
TheKentuckian
May 2012
#58
a prolonged period of unemployment has actually led me to believe that most jobs are worthless,
HiPointDem
May 2012
#74
Let me explain. When one can retire at 50, one has more worth than those who must continue to labor
Bluenorthwest
May 2012
#86