Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For people talking about having a 50 year old retirement age [View all]JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)65. The 35-hour work week would be a good compromise.
When I was working, I sometimes had to work 70 hours and more. That's too much when you are in your 50s and 60s. But working is really a joy if you can get work.
Problem is employers will still hire people in their 50s if they really need someone, but they are generally reluctant to hire and sometimes even to continue employing people over 60. I've seen this over and over.
And, face it, we do slow down when we get over 65 or so.
But we are in our prime in our 50s. Remember that. You are probably in your prime in your 50s. Don't let anyone tell you any different. Best years in life.
It's a shame the economy is so bad since Bush. That man and his buddies really messed things up for the rest of America.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Back when my husband retired, during the Clinton years, many of the retirees we met
Cleita
May 2012
#10
Please make a thread about this so I can rec it. It deserves to be discussed AT LENGTH.
Zalatix
May 2012
#33
I think what you said is probably the worst indictment of western civilization I've read here.
Selatius
May 2012
#68
The wealth isn't being hoarded by baby boomers, it's being hoarded by the Plutocracy.
Zalatix
May 2012
#34
i was with you until "it's all hogged by the baby boomers in their late 50s".
HiPointDem
May 2012
#71
I don't have a job to have self worth. I trade my labor to pay for things.
OmahaBlueDog
May 2012
#21
If it were distributed properly (to everyone according to need).........
socialist_n_TN
May 2012
#24
the entire concept of "self-worth" comes from without. it's a concept given to us by our society
HiPointDem
May 2012
#75
I retired at 62 and I am not bored. I don't know how I ever found the time to work.
doc03
May 2012
#23
When I used to see stories on the late news about little old ladies found dead in their
Booster
May 2012
#26
Yes. There is plenty of time between age 50 and dying amongst cat food cans
Luminous Animal
May 2012
#62
People don't need to feel like they have worth if they can have fun and sit on their asses.
dkf
May 2012
#27
yep. rich people don't have to worry about their self-worth. their money makes it irrelevant.
HiPointDem
May 2012
#76
A person's self-worth is not determined by how much money they make for the capitalists...
Comrade_McKenzie
May 2012
#30
Why would being retired make one feel worthless, unless their self worth was derived from work?
TheKentuckian
May 2012
#58
a prolonged period of unemployment has actually led me to believe that most jobs are worthless,
HiPointDem
May 2012
#74
Let me explain. When one can retire at 50, one has more worth than those who must continue to labor
Bluenorthwest
May 2012
#86