Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mariana

(15,613 posts)
15. They're divided into 4 year segments
Wed May 23, 2012, 06:34 AM
May 2012

(Obama '10, '11, '12, and '13, Bush II '06, '07, '08 and '09). And the first fiscal year they are responsible for is the one following their inaugurations.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wrong! Zalatix May 2012 #1
Damn right! When exactly did it happen? Mariana May 2012 #14
How did this make it into the WSJ??? cui bono May 2012 #2
they're probably afraid of Mittens too magical thyme May 2012 #16
or maybe Warren Buffett bought the WSJ? Rosa Luxemburg May 2012 #34
Great chart goclark May 2012 #3
When the republicans run on jobs and win safeinOhio May 2012 #4
Thanks! kick and rec emulatorloo May 2012 #5
Hoover-like behaviors beget MannyGoldstein May 2012 #6
I think this is the link you really want. xtraxritical May 2012 #7
Saw this chart on Ed's show tonight PatSeg May 2012 #8
what's the rationale for showing everyone's term starting a year later than it actually did, and HiPointDem May 2012 #13
They're divided into 4 year segments Mariana May 2012 #15
And their first year in office PatSeg May 2012 #21
Exactly. nt. Mariana May 2012 #27
Which means, the deficit of $1.2 trillion for 2009 belonged to Dubya? kentuck May 2012 #29
The US fiscal year starts on October 1. So, yeah, until September 30, 2009, the budget was tclambert May 2012 #32
That chart along with a Romney quote has gone viral on facebook underpants May 2012 #30
Oh that is so perfect! PatSeg May 2012 #33
I tried to point that out to the folks here sometime ago, w/no more interest that I see here NOW : supraTruth May 2012 #9
Well they better get interested because this will be key in Romney's propaganda campaign. ErikJ May 2012 #10
SO TWEET the TRUTH TO ALL OF THE LAMEstreamCORPORATEmedia UNtil they have NO choice BUT to PAY supraTruth May 2012 #11
I'm sorry ... when did FACTS ever come into play in an Election??? zbdent May 2012 #18
Marketwatch has a bar graph, says same thing. DiverDave May 2012 #12
well we all know what left-wing librul media magical thyme May 2012 #17
Yep, I saw something DiverDave May 2012 #23
I seriously love graphs and data onlyadream May 2012 #19
Yup Johnny2X2X May 2012 #20
K&R! tallahasseedem May 2012 #22
This is in the WSJ? EC May 2012 #24
It's more like, if Rmoney wins & signs the Ryan plan... Amonester May 2012 #31
Makes perfect sense. He's a loser and a Mormon. Forget Paul, nice guy, no president. cr8tvlde May 2012 #35
K & R Scurrilous May 2012 #25
Almost all Republicans believe the opposite... kentuck May 2012 #26
k&r... spanone May 2012 #28
I want to print this on peel and stick yankeepants May 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street Journal - &qu...»Reply #15