Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FWIW I don't believe the Pope met with Davis- [View all]dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)39. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???
I SAID "I READ IT AND NOW I KNOW BETTER!!! Please go back and read my responses. My second response says so RIGHT IN THE REPLY TITLE. and then I say "THANK YOU for enlightening me"
3rd response "I read the article and now I know better.
4th response, again in the REPLY TITLE " I said I read it and am now better informed twice now. then in the body of the reply I say "Ive said Ive read it, Ive thanked you for it...
What facts are there to discuss? I made an assumption, you corrected me and Ive said I read it and now I know better NUMEROUS TIMES NOW. AND YOURE STILL CLAIMING I HAVENT ACKNOWLEDGED IT???????
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fuck him even if he didn't. His words and actions are encouragement to her and all like her.
PeaceNikki
Sep 2015
#3
Um you are uninformed. Not that you want to be informed, but you could be.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2015
#13
Did you read the link? Are we talking about the content? I have posted about this many times on
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2015
#18
You declared that there was 'no way this happened'. Facts suggest it very well may have happened.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2015
#20
When can we discuss the content of the link I posted? My snark was because folks avoid those facts.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2015
#30
I said I read it and am now better informed twice now. How is that “avoiding facts”?
dorkzilla
Sep 2015
#35
No, you also claimed that Davis style Christians do not collude with Francis style Christians and I
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2015
#37
No, it's all about YOU and protecting the oppressors from getting their feefees hurt.
PeaceNikki
Sep 2015
#23
With 'them'? I am an individual person. You are calling LGBT persons 'them'?
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2015
#24
Well, we are talking about a guy who is giving asylum to a pedophile enabler
nichomachus
Sep 2015
#41