Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
Mon Oct 5, 2015, 09:17 AM Oct 2015

WaPo Fact Checks President's Claim That States With Most Gun Laws Tend To Have Fewest Gun Deaths [View all]

Washington Post fact checkers give two Pinocchio's to President Obama's claim that states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest gun deaths, which means the statement included "significant omissions and/or exaggerations," although the author notes he waivered between two and three Pinocchio's, with three being in the "mostly false" category. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2015/10/05/obamas-claim-that-states-with-the-most-gun-laws-tend-to-have-the-fewest-gun-deaths/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b

In the article the WaPo explains that when you exclude suicides, which account for 60% of gun deaths, then there is a significant change in where a state might rank in the number of gun deaths per 100,000 people.

First, the WaPo notes that the data is "mixed" on whether stricter gun laws lead to fewer suicides:

Some might argue that it is wrong to exclude suicides from the data, as less access to guns might result in fewer suicides. The data on that is mixed. Gun-related suicides might decline, but studies have shown little connection between suicides and access to guns. A 2004 report published by the National Academy of Sciences concluded that “some gun control policies may reduce the number of gun suicides, but they have not yet been shown to reduce the overall risk of suicide in any population.”

Japan, for instance, has among the world’s most-restrictive gun-control regimes — and yet also has among the world’s highest suicide rates, almost double the U.S. suicide rate.


Second, once you exclude suicides:

Alaska, ranked 50th on the National Journal list, moved up to 25th place. Utah, 31st on the list, jumped to 8th place. Hawaii remains in 1st place, but the top six now include Vermont, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Iowa and Maine. Indeed, half of the 10 states with the lowest gun-death rates turn out to be states with less-restrictive gun laws.

Meanwhile, Maryland — a more urban state — fell from 15th place to 45th, even though it has very tough gun laws. Illinois dropped from 11th place to 38th, and New York fell from 3rd to 15th.


The WaPo concluded that:

While gun suicides are certainly a serious issue — and account for more than 60 percent of gun deaths — the evidence is mixed on whether restricting gun purchases would affect the overall suicide rate. In any case, the president’s policy proposals are aimed at mass shootings, not suicides.


In short, I, along with almost all of the people on DU, support toughening our gun laws to include UBCs and additional training. But stricter gun laws isn't the panacea it is made out to be, and in some states -- notably Maryland -- such laws have had little impact on gun violence.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There will be no changes until those who wish for change pipoman Oct 2015 #1
Of course- because you need to just address violence- not only violence that use certain objects Lee-Lee Oct 2015 #2
Basically the "do nothing" because "stuff happens" approach... Human101948 Oct 2015 #6
That's not at all what I advocated Lee-Lee Oct 2015 #12
Would Maryland's statistics be skewed by Baltimore? Human101948 Oct 2015 #3
You can't cherry pick and throw out the areas that skew results in a way you don't like Lee-Lee Oct 2015 #5
I wasn't trying disprove, I was wondering about distribution, but your Chicago analogy is apt... Human101948 Oct 2015 #7
It also coincides with an economic boom. hughee99 Oct 2015 #10
Nail hit. Whiskeytide Oct 2015 #11
I'll second that! Human101948 Oct 2015 #16
Exactly- when you address the causes of violence it drops Lee-Lee Oct 2015 #20
How can you exclude 60% of gun deaths? mainer Oct 2015 #4
The presence of a gun doesn't cause suicide and the absence pipoman Oct 2015 #8
It's context. Whiskeytide Oct 2015 #13
If the topic of conversation is mass shootings hack89 Oct 2015 #18
The topic in the OP title is "Gun deaths." Not mass shootings. mainer Oct 2015 #19
The OP is about Obama's comments which were directed at mass shootings hack89 Oct 2015 #21
There are multiple layers and solutions must come from all angles. No good data because NRA Justice Oct 2015 #9
It's also interesting that murders via firearm have fallen 50% in the past 25 years NickB79 Oct 2015 #14
The WaPo's info flies directly in the face if everything I've researched underpants Oct 2015 #15
The WaPo cites some pretty reputable and neutral sources TeddyR Oct 2015 #22
If you exclude anyone killed by bullets on American soil, the President is clearly wrong. patsimp Oct 2015 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo Fact Checks Presiden...