Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ibegurpard

(17,081 posts)

43. No

Reply to Karmadillo (Original post)

Fri May 25, 2012, 11:02 AM

May 2012

Are they both corporate shills when it comes to action?
Perhaps, but I'd sure as hell rather be supporting the one who's actually using his position to be stating criticisms of the disgusting level of corporate dominance of our political system.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is racism a subtext in all these attacks on Cory Booker? [View all] Karmadillo May 2012 OP

I don't think so matt819 May 2012 #1

Thanks for the laugh BeyondGeography May 2012 #2

No. Booker claims to be a Democrat while defending vulture capitalism. Dawson Leery May 2012 #3

Oh, please. LeftyMom May 2012 #4

No Pirate Smile May 2012 #5

traitorism is the subtext, in an era when every word counts....the Prez is a master of context...n/t unkachuck May 2012 #6

Perhaps stupidity and pandering is a subtext in Booker's remarks. enough May 2012 #7

Too much for some Americans? cthulu2016 May 2012 #8

Yep, what you said. Booker got exactly what he wanted out of this: publicity & kissing the ass of Booster May 2012 #13

ROFL. Darcy Richardson 2012! AtomicKitten May 2012 #9

it's his bald head. spanone May 2012 #10

You win a cookie. Major Hogwash May 2012 #21

ask a silly question..... spanone May 2012 #25

No you have it backwards racism is the subtext for all the attacks on President Obama by jp11 May 2012 #11

Um, no. CakeGrrl May 2012 #12

.... one_voice May 2012 #14

Nah. The "ferocity" about Booker is because.......... socialist_n_TN May 2012 #15

We have a winner! hifiguy May 2012 #29

Pretty much... Drunken Irishman May 2012 #34

No. Not at all RZM May 2012 #16

No. Not in all of them. KamaAina May 2012 #17

I think that applying race to the complaints about Booker's nonsense is your doing here bigtree May 2012 #18

i think it's more because a black democrat that owed the first black president knifed him instead. HiPointDem May 2012 #19

Not racism, but there could be a racial component cthulu2016 May 2012 #20

Well that was silly. UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #22

Heh. Predictable as always. nt geek tragedy May 2012 #23

ingenuous the way he managed to take Booker's side against the President cali May 2012 #37

The OP must agree with Booker's opinions on Bain. Ikonoklast May 2012 #42

Do yourself a favor and self delete ths! Logical May 2012 #24

hahahha JI7 May 2012 #26

Is trying to make this about racism racist itself? Ikonoklast May 2012 #27

He opened up a can of sting worms politicasista May 2012 #28

No. He either has poor analytical skills or flamingdem May 2012 #30

No. Iggo May 2012 #31

I guess defending Obama against a Booker attack makes one a racist... provis99 May 2012 #32

no Swamp Lover May 2012 #33

no, but trust you to post such dog shit. cali May 2012 #35

No. ananda May 2012 #36

Just Competence battchief May 2012 #38

Hope you took dramamine before spinning like that ... might make you puke. JoePhilly May 2012 #39

Fail! FSogol May 2012 #40

it depends whether their criticism of the Democrats is consistent Enrique May 2012 #41

No ibegurpard May 2012 #43