Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
12. here are the horrible details...worse than I remembered
Sat May 26, 2012, 09:39 AM
May 2012

She was 79 years old, not driving, the car not in motion and fully seated. Simply trying to remove the lid to add cream and sugar.

"A vascular surgeon determined that Liebeck suffered full thickness burns (or third-degree burns) over 6 percent of her body, including her inner thighs, perineum, buttocks, and genital and groin areas. She was hospitalized for eight days, during which time she underwent skin grafting. Liebeck, who also underwent debridement treatments, sought to settle her claim for $20,000, but McDonalds refused.

During discovery, McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700 claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebecks. This history documented McDonalds' knowledge about the extent and nature of this hazard.
McDonalds also said during discovery that, based on a consultants advice, it held its coffee at between 180 and 190 degrees fahrenheit to maintain optimum taste. He admitted that he had not evaluated the safety ramifications at this temperature. Other establishments sell coffee at substantially lower temperatures, and coffee served at home is generally 135 to 140 degrees.

Further, McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185 degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above, and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn the mouth and throat. The quality assurance manager admitted that burns would occur, but testified that McDonalds had no intention of reducing the "holding temperature" of its coffee."


http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Obit. from The Times Feb. 7th '12 [View all] dipsydoodle May 2012 OP
He is survived by Right Wing Tripe who sent his condolences in a viral email... rfranklin May 2012 #1
+1 Scuba May 2012 #2
this lie bothers me every time I read it magical thyme May 2012 #3
+1000 deutsey May 2012 #6
yup - google mcdonald's coffee "unfit for human consumption" bananas May 2012 #7
I've actually seen pictures of some of these coffee burns Greybnk48 May 2012 #8
Apparently HBO did a documentary last year bananas May 2012 #10
Thanks for the info. Greybnk48 May 2012 #11
here are the horrible details...worse than I remembered magical thyme May 2012 #12
All I read was HughBeaumont May 2012 #4
Nailed it! pinboy3niner May 2012 #5
LOL! +100 n/t Greybnk48 May 2012 #9
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obit. from The Times Feb....»Reply #12