Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
27. Well, this old person (63) finds Facebook to be
Sun May 27, 2012, 05:36 PM
May 2012

of limited usefulness. Both of those word are important, limited and useful.

It's useful when I haven't talked to either of my young adult sons in a while, and I can get a sense of what they might be up to. But limited in that I personally almost never post anything at all, and I'm crazed by all the random comments that so many seem to think need to be posted so frequently. I maybe take a look at FB a couple of times a week. If others want to live their lives on FB, so be it.

I do want to point out that the initial concept made a whole lot of sense for college students, and in many important ways those who are running FB have at least so far, not moved beyond a college mentality/way of looking at things. Adults out in the real world are appropriately wary of putting things there that younger kids think nothing of, and which all too often come back to haunt them.

In my youth I certainly did things that I would not want the whole world to know about years later, and because I did them long before the internet, there's not stuff out there to shadow me forever.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dNDBDDBmcdkvndjvndnJ randome May 2012 #1
What is facebook? Life Long Dem May 2012 #2
were you going to communicate w/FB friends in some other way instead and chose to use FB? msongs May 2012 #3
It's a cartoon. kentuck May 2012 #4
like Broderick May 2012 #5
Hide. MineralMan May 2012 #6
alert Voice for Peace May 2012 #15
. EFerrari May 2012 #7
Not really. It depends on how you use it. MineralMan May 2012 #8
I actually got this cartoon off Facebook... kentuck May 2012 #9
I figured. There's lots on Facebook that I just skip, of course. MineralMan May 2012 #10
I will argue Control-Z May 2012 #25
Interesting.. kentuck May 2012 #26
I can see where that would be of concern. MineralMan May 2012 #30
Are they tweens or teens? riderinthestorm May 2012 #32
Lol. I'm sorry but Control-Z May 2012 #37
I emailed an old friend to ask her how she was doing. Ilsa May 2012 #11
Intimacy matters. jp11 May 2012 #17
I agree w/ you Completely. nt Ilsa May 2012 #34
Not at all. It keeps me in touch with family and friends. YellowRubberDuckie May 2012 #12
I love Facebook. Webster Green May 2012 #13
No more (IMHO) than text messages. Edweird May 2012 #14
Nnnnnnope. cherokeeprogressive May 2012 #16
Meaningful conversation died long before Facebook. Speck Tater May 2012 #18
From the people that brought you... Scootaloo May 2012 #19
"This new thing will be the end of all civilization!" Posteritatis May 2012 #20
Pfft... TELEVISION killed meaningful conversation. annabanana May 2012 #21
Friggin' cuneiform, man. How far we have fallen. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #22
Yeah, I blame the advent of runes. Fire Walk With Me May 2012 #35
But radio DID kill meaningful conversation. randome May 2012 #31
I think it's terrible, people spend all their time posting little comments on the internet... CJCRANE May 2012 #23
FB is for people with whom I don't want a meaningful conversation Bluenorthwest May 2012 #24
Well, this old person (63) finds Facebook to be SheilaT May 2012 #27
Hang on. I'll answer after I post this kitteh picture I found on my wall. HopeHoops May 2012 #28
IDK rug May 2012 #29
Television already did that decades and decades ago.. n/t Fumesucker May 2012 #33
Not at all, no XemaSab May 2012 #36
OMG. LOL. YMMV Rincewind May 2012 #38
irony Sea-Dog May 2012 #39
Aziz Ansari had a bit one time: Initech May 2012 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Facebook destroying me...»Reply #27