General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cali -- I'm sorry. I meant to warn you. You have a target on your back. [View all]MisterP
(23,730 posts)This is "disruptive meta" if I've ever seen it. Childish rehashing of old material from some off-site group. Dire "warnings" about "target on your back." All people have to do is behave civilly and they'll have no problems. This kind of shit makes DU suck.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Nov 18, 2015, 05:57 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The alert kind of confirms the problem. There's literally nothing in the OP that warrants an alert. It's a claim, with sourced documentation. Done. Of all the nebulous and phantom 'alert stalking' claims around here that Skinner continually states isn't actually a problem, the OP has actually highlighted one that is both real, and can be proven.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Ojo.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: so what the alerter is saying, that we should find HCS's plotting from THIS month
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Why the need to make such a show of this in front of everyone on DU? Why not just send Cali a PM if you are that worried? I agree with the alerter. This kind of childish bullshit makes DU suck. Grow up!
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Sigh. I was hoping the Bernie brigade would implode with more class but then I've always been a dreamer . . .