Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cali -- I'm sorry. I meant to warn you. You have a target on your back. [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)45. Deny/Disrupt/Degrade/Deceive: Professional Quadruple Naught Disinformationist

How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
By Glenn Greenwald
The Intercept, 24 Feb 2014
One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. Its time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents.
Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series of articles about dirty trick tactics used by GCHQs previously secret unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other three partners in the English-speaking Five Eyes alliance. Today, we at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full, entitled The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.
SNIP...
Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: false flag operations (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting negative information on various forums. Here is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document were publishing today:

SNIP...
No matter your views on Anonymous, hacktivists or garden-variety criminals, it is not difficult to see how dangerous it is to have secret government agencies being able to target any individuals they want who have never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any crimes with these sorts of online, deception-based tactics of reputation destruction and disruption. There is a strong argument to make, as Jay Leiderman demonstrated in the Guardian in the context of the Paypal 14 hacktivist persecution, that the denial of service tactics used by hacktivists result in (at most) trivial damage (far less than the cyber-warfare tactics favored by the US and UK) and are far more akin to the type of political protest protected by the First Amendment.
CONTINUED w/links, sources, details...
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Cali -- I'm sorry. I meant to warn you. You have a target on your back. [View all]
magical thyme
Nov 2015
OP
the truth itself didnt do it it was the way cali said it - she got frustrated and resorted to a
saturnsring
Nov 2015
#47
Hillary people gave Grayson an immediate bump in fund raising today on the DU
Omaha Steve
Nov 2015
#82
Why are Clinton supporters allowed to get away with this type of planned attack against DUers?
peacebird
Nov 2015
#6
some people get repeated time outs and flagged for reviews and nothing happens.
hobbit709
Nov 2015
#18
I would suggest that a couple of those jurors be alerted on for their idiotic comments.
ScreamingMeemie
Nov 2015
#56
If you were the alerter or one of the jury members, you can alert on the DU mail
ScreamingMeemie
Nov 2015
#76
This is unacceptable. The members involved should be given lengthy timeouts or be banned.
Scuba
Nov 2015
#34
Link please? And, for the record, you will find me speaking about neither candidate on this site
ScreamingMeemie
Nov 2015
#87
I don't think these are actually DUers. This George II looks like a piece of shit.
DisgustipatedinCA
Nov 2015
#55