Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
56. Massachusetts law -- maximum for each of the charges totals 60 years
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 07:53 PM
Nov 2015

Whoever, without lawful authority, forcibly or secretly confines or imprisons another person within this commonwealth against his will, or forcibly carries or sends such person out of this commonwealth, or forcibly seizes and confines or inveigles or kidnaps another person, with intent either to cause him to be secretly confined or imprisoned in this commonwealth against his will, or to cause him to be sent out of this commonwealth against his will or in any way held to service against his will, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than ten years
https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter265/Section26

(iv) is 18 years of age or older and, by means of a dangerous weapon, commits an assault and battery upon a child under the age of 14;
shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 15 years
https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter265/Section15a

''Substantial bodily injury'', bodily injury which creates a permanent disfigurement, protracted loss or impairment of a function of a body member, limb or organ, or substantial risk of death.
Whoever commits an assault and battery upon a child and by such assault and battery causes substantial bodily injury shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than fifteen years
https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter265/Section13J
A toddler dumped by the side of a state highway is at substantial risk of death. If she hadn't been seen, she could have died of exposure. If she'd crawled into the street, obviously she could have been run over. She could have been killed by the fall if they threw her out of the car (as has been suggested in some articles).

Section 16. Whoever, in the night time, breaks and enters a building, ship, vessel or vehicle, with intent to commit a felony
whether he succeeds or fails in the perpetration of such larceny or felony, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than twenty years

Up to 60 years based on the charges listed in the article. All of those are the maximums; there also were significantly lesser possible charges with fines. Given the circumstances -- premeditation, vengeance, the age of the victim, I expect they'll go for something closer to the maximum.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That idiot needs to be locked up for a very long time. hobbit709 Nov 2015 #1
What idiot? Warpy Nov 2015 #29
You got a link to that info? Flying Squirrel Nov 2015 #33
Try the one in the OP Warpy Nov 2015 #36
It says plain as day that she's being held without bail Flying Squirrel Nov 2015 #37
it's been a developing story. She's been arrested, charged and is being held magical thyme Nov 2015 #47
Good. No bail is good in this case Warpy Nov 2015 #55
It could be for her own protection. lpbk2713 Nov 2015 #57
All I can say- ruffburr Nov 2015 #2
WTF? sakabatou Nov 2015 #3
That'll show 'em, Abigail Hannah. You can celebrate your cleverness in about 20 years. DisgustipatedinCA Nov 2015 #4
Sounds like a Dahmer in the making, only worse. merrily Nov 2015 #5
Oh My goodness! The accused is a pretty blonde white girl! alphafemale Nov 2015 #6
How did I know someone one posted some stupid shit like this melman Nov 2015 #13
She will not be charged as she should. alphafemale Nov 2015 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Donald Ian Rankin Nov 2015 #38
Seriously? Donald Ian Rankin Nov 2015 #39
Massachusetts law -- maximum for each of the charges totals 60 years magical thyme Nov 2015 #56
But after all, the victim was a privileged little white girl herself Shankapotomus Nov 2015 #40
BS. Held without bail, charged with kidnapping,assault & battery w/dangerous weapon, assault & batt magical thyme Nov 2015 #48
What kind of stupid fucking shit is this?? nt ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2015 #45
oh, don't you know? Skittles Nov 2015 #58
Shes clearly mentally ill, she needs treatment and therapy not imprisonment 951-Riverside Nov 2015 #7
Well played. AngryAmish Nov 2015 #8
Yes for about 40 years or so... Kalidurga Nov 2015 #9
I don't think she's mentally ill. Some people are just ASSHOLES. MADem Nov 2015 #15
The articles do not list any reason that they think it is the babysitter. patricia92243 Nov 2015 #10
She was charged with kidnapping. Police must have some idea it was her. nt valerief Nov 2015 #11
she was fired by the parents shanti Nov 2015 #12
Ruin the pretty white girls life? alphafemale Nov 2015 #19
Why are you... TeeYiYi Nov 2015 #23
I'm playing the race card? alphafemale Nov 2015 #32
Hmmm, obsessed with the race of the suspect. kiva Nov 2015 #35
nutcase Skittles Nov 2015 #59
Your responses in this thread is what a "fucked concept" looks like flying. nt ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2015 #46
If the suspect were the Carlos the landscaper, there'd be fewer doubts of the prosecutors story. nt lumberjack_jeff Nov 2015 #25
I dunno. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #27
Haters gotta hate, huh? notadmblnd Nov 2015 #54
the police are being "tight-lipped" per the article. Possible motive -- recently fired. nt magical thyme Nov 2015 #49
She should be charged with attempted murder. Boudica the Lyoness Nov 2015 #16
Not to mention the child was naked and exposed to the elements. herding cats Nov 2015 #18
I saw this on the local news this morning. All I could think about was thank god smirkymonkey Nov 2015 #17
Horrible in so many ways. trumad Nov 2015 #20
I think he meant that his brain couldn't process what it saw.. toddler outside alone Liberal_in_LA Nov 2015 #21
I took it as some sort of religious vision... trumad Nov 2015 #22
He clearly says he saw the actual kid, but wasn't sure if it was a baby or a doll. LisaL Nov 2015 #24
exactly. it takes a minute for your rational mind to process the image in your brain. magical thyme Nov 2015 #50
Monster MoonRiver Nov 2015 #26
article does not say how perp got access to the child . peculiar nt msongs Nov 2015 #28
Another article says she broke into the house exboyfil Nov 2015 #31
Hamilton is a 1%er neighborhood. She's going to need a team of fancy lawyers magical thyme Nov 2015 #51
Will be an interesting test case to follow exboyfil Nov 2015 #30
1%er toddler as victim? Affluenza won't fly... magical thyme Nov 2015 #52
You have to admit, as far as revenge ploys go, the babysitter was thorough. randome Nov 2015 #34
It's surreal, I've found her facebook page ck4829 Nov 2015 #41
The premeditation and successive abusive acts to a child deserves a very long sentence aikoaiko Nov 2015 #42
Now we know why she was fired. AwakeAtLast Nov 2015 #43
Would not be surprised to learn Tipperary Nov 2015 #44
How could this even be? PatrickforO Nov 2015 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fired babysitter leaves t...»Reply #56