Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)More Baby Boomers Facing Old Age Alone [View all]
Last edited Tue May 29, 2012, 11:46 AM - Edit history (1)
more here......
"The shift in marital composition of the middle-aged suggests that researchers and policymakers can no longer focus on widowhood in later life and should pay attention to the vulnerabilities of the never-married and divorced as well," said Lin.
According to Brown, one in five single baby boomers is living in poverty compared to one in 20 for their married counterparts. Single boomers are twice as likely to be disabled, but they are also less likely to have health insurance.
...
Our figures indicate one in three boomers won't have a spouse who can care for them. And, unmarrieds are less likely to have children who might provide care....
...
Every fifth single baby boomer in poverty. And alone. Well, that's just if we don't want to do anything about it.
My Idaho radical rightie (man, Obama is not trying to introduce international rules to take your guns away. Really.) tells me about government compounds for when it gets really bad for enough people, behind barbed wire and guards.
Maybe instead we could pool our social security checks, buy some KOAs. Grow our own food and recreation, play on the canoes, take the camp bus to picket the BOA in town, start co-ops, build electric cars and sell 'em to the townies...
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Woah, I'm NOT pushing zero population growth. I'm pointing out one of its nasty side-effects.
Zalatix
May 2012
#28
Zero population growth means averaging 2 children per couple. It does not mean having no children
Cal33
May 2012
#31
Or so they think. I would trade all the wealth in the world for the real life community I have.
Zalatix
May 2012
#22
That job is a calling. A lot of people simply aren't suited for that kind of work.
Zalatix
May 2012
#30
55, Divorced, No Kids - I Am The Statistic Referenced In The Article - The Last Years Will Be Rough
cantbeserious
May 2012
#6
That's a fine idea, but lacking in reality, IMO. Hippies were young, strong and able.
CTyankee
May 2012
#23
I think the problem with that plan is that a community composed entirely of old people may
HiPointDem
May 2012
#7
My dad always wished I would get married so I would have someone to take care of me in my old age...
DesertDiamond
May 2012
#5
I was going to say, two can live cheaper than one, and you don't have to be married
JDPriestly
May 2012
#8
Nest empty, divorced 12 years, last four serious girlfriends turned out to be hopelessly damaged.
slackmaster
May 2012
#40