Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: More Baby Boomers Facing Old Age Alone [View all]bhikkhu
(10,789 posts)33. A counter-argument - "The Myth of Isolation"
http://cas.umkc.edu/casww/sa/Relationships.htm
Which has some good points. I hadn't read it before, but came across it looking for an article I read not too long ago about how 80% of older people looked forward to living in retirement alone, as opposed to with a spouse. It was a "myth of marital happiness" thing - which I didn't find anyway.
I do know several older people who are very lonely, mostly from having lost spouses recently, but I don't think its a growing or new problem. I certainly don't think having lots of kids is any kind of sane advice either.
Which has some good points. I hadn't read it before, but came across it looking for an article I read not too long ago about how 80% of older people looked forward to living in retirement alone, as opposed to with a spouse. It was a "myth of marital happiness" thing - which I didn't find anyway.
I do know several older people who are very lonely, mostly from having lost spouses recently, but I don't think its a growing or new problem. I certainly don't think having lots of kids is any kind of sane advice either.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Woah, I'm NOT pushing zero population growth. I'm pointing out one of its nasty side-effects.
Zalatix
May 2012
#28
Zero population growth means averaging 2 children per couple. It does not mean having no children
Cal33
May 2012
#31
Or so they think. I would trade all the wealth in the world for the real life community I have.
Zalatix
May 2012
#22
That job is a calling. A lot of people simply aren't suited for that kind of work.
Zalatix
May 2012
#30
55, Divorced, No Kids - I Am The Statistic Referenced In The Article - The Last Years Will Be Rough
cantbeserious
May 2012
#6
That's a fine idea, but lacking in reality, IMO. Hippies were young, strong and able.
CTyankee
May 2012
#23
I think the problem with that plan is that a community composed entirely of old people may
HiPointDem
May 2012
#7
My dad always wished I would get married so I would have someone to take care of me in my old age...
DesertDiamond
May 2012
#5
I was going to say, two can live cheaper than one, and you don't have to be married
JDPriestly
May 2012
#8
Nest empty, divorced 12 years, last four serious girlfriends turned out to be hopelessly damaged.
slackmaster
May 2012
#40