Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WillyT rocks. [View all]Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)179. "And you called the New Republic a center right neoliberal publication."
That would be because it is.
Peretz ownership and eventual editorship, 19741979[edit]
In March 1974, the magazine was purchased for $380,000[12] by Harvard University lecturer Martin Peretz,[16] from Gilbert Harrison.[12] Peretz was a veteran of the New Left who had broken with that movement over its support of various Third World liberationist movements, particularly the Palestine Liberation Organization. Peretz transformed TNR into its current form. Under his ownership, TNR has advocated both strong U.S. support for the Israeli government and a hawkish U.S. foreign policy.[12] On domestic policy, it has advocated a self-critical brand of liberalism, taking positions that range from traditionally liberal to neoliberalism. It has generally supported Democratic candidates for president, although in 1980 it endorsed the moderate Republican John B. Anderson, running as an independent, rather than the Democratic incumbent Jimmy Carter.
Kinsley and Hertzberg editorships, 19791991[edit]
Michael Kinsley, a neoliberal (in the American sense of the term), was editor (19791981; 19851989), alternating twice with Hendrik Hertzberg (19811985; 19891991), who has been called "an old-fashioned social democrat".[citation needed] Kinsley was only 28 years old when he first became editor and was still in law school.[12]
Writers for the magazine during this era included neoliberals Mickey Kaus and Jacob Weisberg along with Charles Krauthammer, Fred Barnes, Morton Kondracke, Sidney Blumenthal, Robert Kuttner, Ronald Steel, Michael Walzer, and Irving Howe.[12]
During the 1980s the magazine generally supported President Ronald Reagan's anti-Communist foreign policy, including provision of aid to the Nicaraguan Contras. It has also supported both Gulf Wars and, reflecting its belief in the moral efficacy of American power, intervention in "humanitarian" crises, such as those in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo during the Yugoslav wars.
The magazine also became known for its originality and unpredictability in the 1980s. It was widely considered a "must read" across the political spectrum. An article in Vanity Fair judged TNR "the smartest, most impudent weekly in the country," and the "most entertaining and intellectually agile magazine in the country." According to Alterman, the magazine's prose could sparkle and the contrasting views within its pages were "genuinely exciting". He added, "The magazine unarguably set the terms of debate for insider political elites during the Reagan era."[12]
With the less predictable opinions, more of them leaning conservative than before, the magazine won the respect of many conservative opinion leaders and 20 copies were messengered to the Reagan White House each Thursday afternoon. Norman Podhoretz called the magazine "indispensable", and George Will said it was "currently the nation's most interesting and most important political journal." National Review described it as "one of the most interesting magazines in the United States."[12]
Sullivan editorship, 19911996[edit]
In 1991, Andrew Sullivan, a 28-year-old gay conservative from Britain, became editor and took the magazine in a somewhat more conservative direction, though the majority of writers remained liberal or neoliberal. Hertzberg soon left the magazine to return to The New Yorker. Kinsley left the magazine in 1996 to found the online magazine Slate.[12]
Sullivan invited Charles Murray to contribute a controversial 10,000-word article that contended blacks may be, as a whole, less intelligent than whites due to genetics. The magazine also published a very critical article about Hillary Clinton's health care plan by Elizabeth McCaughey, an article that Alterman called "the single most influential article published in the magazine during the entire Clinton presidency". However, this article was later shown to be inaccurate and the magazine would later apologize for the story. Sullivan also published a number of pieces by Camille Paglia.[12]
Ruth Shalit, a young writer for the magazine in the Sullivan years, was repeatedly criticized for plagiarism. After the Shalit scandals, the magazine began using fact-checkers during Sullivan's time as editor. One was Stephen Glass, who would be found to have made up quotes, anecdotes and facts in his own articles, while he served as a reporter years later (later dramatized in the feature film Shattered Glass).[12]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Republic#Peretz_ownership_and_eventual_editorship.2C_1974.E2.80.931979
..... and on to the present day. neoliberal economics, frequently neocon foreign policy positions, forays into right wing social policies, yes indeed very much in the DLC Third Way Whathefuckevahtheycallthemselves New Democrat mold.
I was around for the sea change in '74.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
186 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I see more white people here pointing out comments that are construed as racist- than POC
notadmblnd
Dec 2015
#126
No he's a "call Black people and the LBGT community Stockholm Syndrome Sufferers" kind of Democrat .
1StrongBlackMan
Dec 2015
#64
You apologized for mocking sensitivities about chicken and watermelon jokes- claiming you had
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#144
Bizarre that a person can apologize for something, then pretend it never happened. And it's all
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#148
Agree. Or like a kid with a chocolate-smeared face insisting he didn't eat the candy bar. nt
betsuni
Dec 2015
#170
"Bizarre that a person can apologize for something, then pretend it never happened."
Major Hogwash
Dec 2015
#171
the funny thing is that they honestly read the same post and think it validates their claim.
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2015
#91
I don't know nuthin' bout no history of chicken and watermelon jokes, Mr SBM!
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#153
"And you called the New Republic a center right neoliberal publication."
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2015
#179
It was a repulsive OP. Explain how it is not totally insulting to "groups" here?
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#145
It's totally meaningless, but looks cogent and pity in the reply title.....
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#146
I can add a question mark to an insulting statement and it nullifies it? What planet is this true on
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#185
Amusing- if anyone were to agree with you- they'd get a hide. Here kitty kitty.
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#154
Manny had no idea that POC were slurred with chicken or watermelon jokes....
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#147
Some love to step right up to the line and say they don't see it, even when responding to posts....
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#162
Willy T spreads so much joy. He makes me happy everyday. Thank you.
DamnYankeeInHouston
Dec 2015
#77
Willy is awesome. I've never seen anyone on this board so bullied and remain so positive.
sibelian
Dec 2015
#119
So using YOUR OWN WORDS… it's okay to say everyone who voted to leave your post
KittyWampus
Dec 2015
#128
Willy T is positive by telling large groups of people they have Stockholm Syndrome?
kwassa
Dec 2015
#129
It is funny. You think one day we will finally crown a King or Queen of DU Purity?
Rex
Dec 2015
#174
Gas lighting bullshit. People are comprehending just fine, Manny. They aren't playing stupid games.
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#151