Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PRI The World: Why Texas May Become a Blue State [View all]Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)35. The Catholic Church was fine with abortion
as long as it was performed before quickening or ensoulment:
It was commonly held, even by Christians, that a human being did not come into existence as such immediately on conception, but only some weeks later. This view was strongly expressed by Saint Anselm of Canterbury (10331109), who said that "no human intellect accepts the view that an infant has the rational soul from the moment of conception."[14] In that view, early abortion was not homicide, the killing of a human being. A few decades after the death of Anselm, this became part of Catholic canon law in the Decretum Gratiani, which stated that "he is not a murderer who brings about abortion before the soul is in the body."[14] While not classified as homicide, early abortion was considered gravely wrong: Thomas Aquinas, who accepted Aristotle's theory that a human soul was infused only after 40 days for a male fetus, 60 days for a female, saw abortion of an unsouled fetus as a sin against marriage.[14] He wrote: "This sin, although grave and to be reckoned among misdeeds and against nature...is something less than homicide... nor is such to be judged irregular[15] unless one procures the abortion of an already formed fetus."[16]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_abortion
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
One has to wonder why any Hispanic person would have ever been Republican at all.
Zalatix
May 2012
#2
When I first started posting at DU that was still the official Roman Catholic position.
ieoeja
May 2012
#43
I must have been thinking birth control. However, Catholics are no more and no less pro-choice.
ieoeja
May 2012
#44
They believed it was acceptable through quickening. I don't see how that differs from pro-choice. nt
ieoeja
May 2012
#47
heard that on NPR, also... but considering that they are the "Liberal Bureau" of FOX
stlsaxman
May 2012
#56
I assume that Latinos are motivated to a significant extent by self-interest
skepticscott
May 2012
#21
I voted yesterday and the Republican primary voting line was much longer than the Democrats.
Dustlawyer
May 2012
#11
My experience as well, but in 1969. The GOP whined and their YAF were a joke.
freshwest
May 2012
#52