Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Identity Politics. I am not interested in them. [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(105,866 posts)116. Malik seems to define multiculturalism in 2 incompatible ways
"multiculturalismthe embrace of an inclusive, diverse society"
"Multiculturalists argue that societal diversity erodes the possibility of common values"
So, is the diversity of multiculturalism inclusive or divisive? He's argued for both in the same article.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The major social justice movements we have seen have been based on identity politics
loyalsister
Dec 2015
#71
Maybe it's the word "politics" I can't get passed. Maybe if it was Social Identity Justice perhaps
Bubzer
Dec 2015
#72
'They' vs 'We' is classic identity politics. You practice it even as you criticize it
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#84
In the long run Identity Politics and Multiculturalism are not good for the country.
earthside
Dec 2015
#11
It's always amusing to see replies like "but so-and-so supports that too, so how can you? "
LittleBlue
Dec 2015
#12
Ahh, I see. And here I thought you said he had a different definition for the term.
Shandris
Dec 2015
#109
Post a link to an instance. This honest person would appreciate it. eom.
1StrongBlackMan
Dec 2015
#110
I am interested when someone treats someone else based on one thing like gender, skin color,
uppityperson
Dec 2015
#25
I have had it out with some of those sorts, it reminds me of the crab in a bucket thing
uppityperson
Dec 2015
#33
Are you just doing this to create drama? Posting here and then complaining about responses on DI?
seaglass
Dec 2015
#31
The important part is you found a way to feel superior to everyone else.
Act_of_Reparation
Dec 2015
#35
I could buy that argument if last years call to arms wasn't "the war on women" n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2015
#54
well, you argued that the debate around abortion was about "eliminating" straight white male voices
tishaLA
Dec 2015
#56
"war on women" rhetoric is a call to defend them against "not women", right?
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2015
#62
no, because in the rhetoric of the "war on women," some women participate in the wrong side
tishaLA
Dec 2015
#66
LOL, nope. It is against any and all who want to limit women's reproductive freedom.
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#77
"identitarianism" is a bit controversial as an analysis, but it becomes very interesting online
MisterP
Dec 2015
#60
I think that we (and POC) would not have the vote today, or be able to won land if not for....
bettyellen
Dec 2015
#81
You don't really seem to understand the term at all. You do in fact practice identity politics
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#85
