Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(76,790 posts)
6. Sorry Dude, But. . .
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 11:42 AM
Dec 2015

. . .i need way more than one guy. Is the dem party progressive enough? Not for me, no.

Is it light years less reactionary than the R's? You bet.

One picture isn't going to change my mind that people are wrong when they suggest their isn't a dime's bit of difference.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

only from fucking idiots and Naderites... whatthehey Dec 2015 #1
I agree, sensible people can tell the difference between The Third Way candidates and Republicons rhett o rick Dec 2015 #21
All the time. Mostly from people who believe in shit like ghosts. valerief Dec 2015 #2
What more evidence would one need than ... Scuba Dec 2015 #3
Sorry Dude, But. . . ProfessorGAC Dec 2015 #6
Oh, there's a difference. One team is OK with gays and other minorities. Scuba Dec 2015 #8
I See More Than That ProfessorGAC Dec 2015 #12
The guy who left the Party edhopper Dec 2015 #9
Joe exemplifies the hubris of the Democratic Party Elites that want to nominate a pro-corp rhett o rick Dec 2015 #22
My daughter has said those exact words. Actually she said there is no differance patricia92243 Dec 2015 #4
K&R! n/t RKP5637 Dec 2015 #5
These comment usually come from rPukes who wish to dissuade and discourage TexasProgresive Dec 2015 #7
Voting for whoever the Dem is would be like randys1 Dec 2015 #28
What's with the harang against Hillary edhopper Dec 2015 #10
Thank you! Bill was the best President in my lifetime. Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2015 #13
Bill didn't "keep us out of involving ground troops overseas" Bradical79 Dec 2015 #20
but a vanishingly small fraction of them died compared to under other POTUS' whatthehey Dec 2015 #25
Yes, definitely Bradical79 Dec 2015 #27
I Don't Know - Maybe Taking The $100,000 Checks From Goldman Sachs Yallow Dec 2015 #14
There is a difference between the Clinton's charity and their comradebillyboy Dec 2015 #33
I usually hear that from people who don't want family and friends fighting over politics. Gidney N Cloyd Dec 2015 #11
I think most are the same bigwillq Dec 2015 #15
Sure ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2015 #16
No, they are not "all the same," yet for the most part they all put the interests of Big Money Maedhros Dec 2015 #17
reflect on your comment melm00se Dec 2015 #18
In that respect, yes. But "the same" in every respect? No. [n/t] Maedhros Dec 2015 #19
They aren't all the same of course Bradical79 Dec 2015 #23
they think it's cool to be cynical treestar Dec 2015 #24
Yes, almost always when a GOPer is losing an argument and so they hail merry Rex Dec 2015 #26
Carlin said none of them care about us., and I believe that. Most dont anyway. randys1 Dec 2015 #30
Most of the biggest yackers I've met in life don't vote. Rex Dec 2015 #31
Summary: "They're all the same except my candidate, who is different" mathematic Dec 2015 #29
The oligarchy loves that phrase, because it benefits Republicans in elections. emulatorloo Dec 2015 #32
I have started saying, "So you wouldn't mind going ahead and voting for the Democrat then?" That retread Dec 2015 #34
it's not that 'they're all the same', it's that, on too many issues, they're not different enough.. KG Dec 2015 #35
Locking mcar Dec 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ever Heard "They Are All ...»Reply #6