Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lame54

(39,771 posts)
51. Sex Pistols, butthole surfers, dead kennedy's, nashville pussy, the queers...
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 10:05 AM
Dec 2015

the circle jerks, black sabbath, joy division-new order, steely dan, porno for pyros, cherry poppin' daddies, bad religion, N.W.A.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Offensive trademarks ban revoked [View all] philosslayer Dec 2015 OP
I would like to see the DC football team change its name, but not because of government action onenote Dec 2015 #1
^^^ This ^^^ Xipe Totec Dec 2015 #4
+2 nomorenomore08 Dec 2015 #22
How is trademark protection a first amendment issue? Adrahil Dec 2015 #26
Because the first amendment doesn't allow the government onenote Dec 2015 #34
Then try airing a cigarette commercial on TV jberryhill Dec 2015 #47
Incorrect. Adrahil Dec 2015 #48
Yup. n/t X_Digger Dec 2015 #37
It's not going to happen as long as "politically correct" is part of our lexicon loyalsister Dec 2015 #56
I wonder if i could trademark "pink tacos" Katashi_itto Dec 2015 #2
Someone already did. It's a restaurant chain in the Western U.S. n/t nomorenomore08 Dec 2015 #23
Drat! Thanks Katashi_itto Dec 2015 #41
What's wrong with the name "Washington Potatoes"? KamaAina Dec 2015 #3
Thanks for the amusement!!! As a Cowboys fan, anything about Danny-boys team madinmaryland Dec 2015 #12
Is Snyder the worst team owner/manager in all of pro sports? nomorenomore08 Dec 2015 #24
4-10. hobbit709 Dec 2015 #44
The stupid runs deep in this country. GeorgeGist Dec 2015 #5
Good decision. I love the 1st and hate censorship. Bonx Dec 2015 #6
Failing to grant an exclusive monopoly in words is not "censorship" jberryhill Dec 2015 #8
Government was attempting to restrict ordinary business use of speech former9thward Dec 2015 #13
Not at all jberryhill Dec 2015 #15
Do you think it would be constitutional for the government onenote Dec 2015 #35
Of what mark? jberryhill Dec 2015 #38
I'll restate: would it be constitutional for the government to refuse onenote Dec 2015 #45
You clearly do not understand the issue here jberryhill Dec 2015 #46
Agree, "Wizards of the Coast" tried to trademark "Nazis" Katashi_itto Dec 2015 #42
You are making a libertarian argument. former9thward Dec 2015 #53
Rofl jberryhill Dec 2015 #54
In general, I would agree with you. nomorenomore08 Dec 2015 #25
"The idea of the federal government altering trademark law" jberryhill Dec 2015 #32
Okay, fair enough. I thought it was a matter of singling out the Redskins on purpose, but maybe not. nomorenomore08 Dec 2015 #36
So you would be ok if an NFL team decided to use the name "n*****'s" instead of?? madinmaryland Dec 2015 #14
The team can call itself what it wants jberryhill Dec 2015 #16
So you are ok if a team from whatever league calls itself the "C" word or the "N" word madinmaryland Dec 2015 #18
What makes you think I'm "okay" with such a thing? jberryhill Dec 2015 #19
Sure, why not? And if nobody bothers to associate with the team it folds. Waldorf Dec 2015 #30
I wonder if this affects a certain South Park episode NobodyHere Dec 2015 #7
Ugh. Ugh. Fucking Ugh. Chan790 Dec 2015 #9
I agree that the name is offensive. And the public should keep the pressure on Snyder as much as nomorenomore08 Dec 2015 #27
Trademarks are actually a restriction on speech, not free speech. surrealAmerican Dec 2015 #10
You seem to be one of the few people who gets this point jberryhill Dec 2015 #17
Good. Nye Bevan Dec 2015 #11
Should the FCC be able to decide what is offensive? madinmaryland Dec 2015 #20
No. Nye Bevan Dec 2015 #21
I agree that such a move by the FCC would be absurd. nomorenomore08 Dec 2015 #28
Absolutely not. GGJohn Dec 2015 #29
I applaud this decision! Heeeeers Johnny Dec 2015 #31
The correct decision. First Amendment should prevail LittleBlue Dec 2015 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author Monk06 Dec 2015 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author Monk06 Dec 2015 #39
I despise the name but the decision was correct Lee-Lee Dec 2015 #43
Some of the responses in this thread are amazing to me.... Adrahil Dec 2015 #49
Another Idiocracy documentary bit of prescience whatthehey Dec 2015 #50
Sex Pistols, butthole surfers, dead kennedy's, nashville pussy, the queers... lame54 Dec 2015 #51
We either have free speech or we don't. I'm glad we do. Android3.14 Dec 2015 #52
"Fucking a!"(tm) Rex Dec 2015 #55
THE SLANTS yuiyoshida Dec 2015 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Offensive trademarks ban ...»Reply #51