Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

4. That's because they don't have the ocean.

Reply to uppityperson (Reply #3)

Tue Jan 19, 2016, 02:41 AM

Jan 2016

OF course, if we can manage to leave the corporations in charge, that map will change as they continue to rid us of all that pesky Greenland and Arctic Ice .

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WashingtonPost Wonkblog GIF compares "value" of land in US to area of land in US. [View all] kristopher Jan 2016 OP

By "value" do you mean cost? uppityperson Jan 2016 #1

Link to article added. kristopher Jan 2016 #2

Thanks, it's a big difference, coastal vs inland. Central states are much more affordable uppityperson Jan 2016 #3

That's because they don't have the ocean. kristopher Jan 2016 #4

You'd think we coastal people would pay less because we can't go in all directions because uppityperson Jan 2016 #5

8-) kristopher Jan 2016 #6

Give us time newfie11 Jan 2016 #7

Looks like the beta weight on value is as much being metropolitan HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #8