Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Clean Eating Delusion [View all]Babel_17
(5,400 posts)57. OK, but then it's ignoring history
We aren't where we are today because people formed their opinions while living in a vacuum. The article focuses too much on faddists, and ignore the real issues. I suspect the author is unaware of the underlying issues.
Eating raw is nothing but pure nonsense. Cooking changes food, mostly for the better, making certain nutrients more accessible and digestion easier. Some types of cooking, or overcooking, (such as boiling vegetables) can remove nutrients from certain foods, but it is not necessary to eat raw in order to get adequate nutrition (and of course, microwaves are no better or worse than any other source of heat).
Raw eating often involves pure pseudoscience, such as the claim that it is better to eat food that is alive, and cooking kills food. Stomach acids also kill food, by the way. Raw claims vary from the pseudoscientific to the mystical, with claims about the essence of food.
So milk that hasn't been heated to hell and gone has no benefit, nor does un-denatured whey protein. The Japanese are wasting their time with Miso, and so is all the world with their fermented vegetables.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
but that doesn't mean that sometimes it is not right. The whole dog treat deaths
hollysmom
Jan 2016
#1
People interested in healthy food are unaware of the continuing fall-out from Fukushima.
Octafish
Jan 2016
#6
Maybe so. But instead of pointing out others' shortcomings, I try to enlighten them.
Octafish
Jan 2016
#71
No, you attempt to derail other people's conversations and make them about you.
anigbrowl
Jan 2016
#78
Democratic doesn't mean you are entitled to be taken seriously every time you open your mouth
anigbrowl
Jan 2016
#92
Quite interesting ... I have had concerns about my officemate, but could not put a name to
etherealtruth
Jan 2016
#8
Granted at least one of them is, shall we say, a Creative Thinker, so its difficult to follow...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2016
#26
Its not that you are wrong about Fukushima leaking, its that this thread is not about that at all...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2016
#74
Again, off topic, not to mention the article you posted is perhaps the worst example of...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2016
#76
Certainly. In #13, you said "It is exactly what the OP is about", and that is completely wrong
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2016
#77
It is why as a working class person I feel uncomfortable among "middle class" people.
Odin2005
Jan 2016
#28
I live around Berkeley, so the local restaurants are hilarious in how they bend over backwards
Prism
Jan 2016
#29
So you Googled to find a definition that suited your purpose in response to the OP?
HuckleB
Jan 2016
#33
Just the opposite actually, they eat whole foods, not marketed processed foods
Babel_17
Jan 2016
#54
They've probably got a very different definition of 'clean eating' than the one described
Marr
Jan 2016
#88
And a lot of people go through hell, trying to find out what in their diet is making them ill
Babel_17
Jan 2016
#36